2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep38610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma

Abstract: Cold atmospheric-pressure plasma (CAP) is a relatively new method being investigated for antimicrobial activity. However, the exact mode of action is still being explored. Here we report that CAP efficacy is directly correlated to bacterial cell wall thickness in several species. Biofilms of Gram positive Bacillus subtilis, possessing a 55.4 nm cell wall, showed the highest resistance to CAP, with less than one log10 reduction after 10 min treatment. In contrast, biofilms of Gram negative Pseudomonas aeruginos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
263
2
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 462 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
263
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…10,11,14,22 The effect can be explained by two factors: (a) decreased UV irradiance at higher levels of RH ( Figure 5A can and teichoic acids than gram-negative bacteria. 29,30 The average thicknesses of cell walls are in the ranges of 30-80 nm and 8-15 nm for gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, respectively. 31 Comparing to the gram-negative bacteria, the thicker cell wall of gram-positive bacteria could block more UV light penetrating into the cells, resulting in higher resistance to UV irradiance.…”
Section: Disinfection Efficacy Of the In-duct Uv Lampmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11,14,22 The effect can be explained by two factors: (a) decreased UV irradiance at higher levels of RH ( Figure 5A can and teichoic acids than gram-negative bacteria. 29,30 The average thicknesses of cell walls are in the ranges of 30-80 nm and 8-15 nm for gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, respectively. 31 Comparing to the gram-negative bacteria, the thicker cell wall of gram-positive bacteria could block more UV light penetrating into the cells, resulting in higher resistance to UV irradiance.…”
Section: Disinfection Efficacy Of the In-duct Uv Lampmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a thin layer of peptidoglycan exists on the internal membrane, on which lipoprotein structures exist, followed by the external membrane only was seen in Gram‐negative bacteria with lipopolysaccharide structures. Such structures do not exist in Gram‐positive bacteria …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…143,144 For example, the Grampositive Bacillus subtilis, have a cell wall of 55.4 nm, the acid-fast M tuberculosis a 20.2 nm 145 while the Gramnegative Pseudomonas aeruginosa, has a cell wall of only a 2.4 nm. 146 Interestingly, although there are important functional differences between the mycobacteria cell wall and gram-positive bacteria, the DNA-based molecular taxonomy of bacteria based on the high similarity to genes, groups the classical acid fast-mycobacteria as gram-positive bacteria. 147 But this overall generalization regarding the susceptibility Figure 3 The three most important routes of antimicrobial action of AgNPs.…”
Section: Antibacterial Effect and Mechanism Of Silver Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%