1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0341-8162(98)00051-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain-size analysis by laser diffractometry: comparison with the sieve-pipette method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
203
0
12

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
15
203
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Underestimation of the % < 2 Am was also reported by Beuselinck et al (1998) and Buurman et al (2001).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analysis Msupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). Underestimation of the % < 2 Am was also reported by Beuselinck et al (1998) and Buurman et al (2001).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analysis Msupporting
confidence: 74%
“…These comparisons have previously been made by Beuselinck et al (1998) and Buurman et al (1997, who showed that both the strength and the form of the relationships between methods depends on the type of sediment or soil analyzed.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analysis Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is not well understood as to why the supposed feedback mechanisms between flow erosivity and bed morphology result in the slope independence of flow velocity. The objective of this paper is to investigate (1) the exact nature of the bed-flow interaction in eroding rills and (2) the extent to which the observed slope independence of flow velocity can be explained by this [Beuselinck et al, 1998]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pipette test is conceptually the most simple and accurate test, see [29], although requires the additional use of a drier and a precision scale. At prescribed times, particle concentrations are measured by weighing the dry residual resulting from 35 ml samples taken at a specified and constant depth y pt using a standard pipette.…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the contact interactions between particles are simulated using the penalization technique from [25]. This paper is centered on the numerical simulation of the ASTM D-422 [26] sedimentation test; in addition and for comparison purposes the less used buoyancy, [27,28], and pipette [29] tests are also studied. The three tests are used in the laboratory to determine the particle size distribution of granular samples with diameters ranging from 2.5 × 10 −6 m to 70 × 10 −6 m; distributions that cannot be easily measured by standard sieving methods as explained in [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%