1995
DOI: 10.1016/0921-3449(94)00040-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain characteristics of crops grown on power plant ash and bottom slag deposit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, total metal(loid)s concentration in fly ash, such as As, B, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Se can be toxic and can vary depending on coal, combustion conditions, operating parameters, transport system, leaching processes, effects on plants, and climatic conditions (Adriano et al, 1980;Haynes, 2009). Over time, proportion of total sand in fly ash is reduced (83.3-71.6%, Gajić et al, 2016) and the clay fraction is increased (1.2-2.5%, Gajić et al, 2016) whereas the percentage of hygroscopic water is increased (0.56-2.3%, Gajić et al, 2016) and this all together provides good aggregation and capillarity (DŽeletović and Filipović, 1995;Gajić et al, 2016). In weathering fly ash, EC values (101.4 µS/cm, 0.217-0.190 dS/m, Gajić et al, 2016) and pH decreased (7.95-7.87, Gajić et al, 2016;8.85, Pandey and Singh, 2014), content of organic carbon (1.85-1.13%, Gajić et al, 2016;2.05%, Jambhulkar and Juwarkar, 2009) and total nitrogen (0.06-0.11%%, Gajić et al, 2016;0.05% Pandey and Singh, 2014) as well as the available content of K 2 O and P 2 O 5 increased (52.5 mg/100 g and 10.1 mg/100 g, Gajić et al, 2016;38.2-59.5 mg/100 g, 25.3 mg/100 g, Kostić et al, 2018).…”
Section: Limiting Factors For Plant Growth On Fly Ash and Mine Waste mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, total metal(loid)s concentration in fly ash, such as As, B, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Se can be toxic and can vary depending on coal, combustion conditions, operating parameters, transport system, leaching processes, effects on plants, and climatic conditions (Adriano et al, 1980;Haynes, 2009). Over time, proportion of total sand in fly ash is reduced (83.3-71.6%, Gajić et al, 2016) and the clay fraction is increased (1.2-2.5%, Gajić et al, 2016) whereas the percentage of hygroscopic water is increased (0.56-2.3%, Gajić et al, 2016) and this all together provides good aggregation and capillarity (DŽeletović and Filipović, 1995;Gajić et al, 2016). In weathering fly ash, EC values (101.4 µS/cm, 0.217-0.190 dS/m, Gajić et al, 2016) and pH decreased (7.95-7.87, Gajić et al, 2016;8.85, Pandey and Singh, 2014), content of organic carbon (1.85-1.13%, Gajić et al, 2016;2.05%, Jambhulkar and Juwarkar, 2009) and total nitrogen (0.06-0.11%%, Gajić et al, 2016;0.05% Pandey and Singh, 2014) as well as the available content of K 2 O and P 2 O 5 increased (52.5 mg/100 g and 10.1 mg/100 g, Gajić et al, 2016;38.2-59.5 mg/100 g, 25.3 mg/100 g, Kostić et al, 2018).…”
Section: Limiting Factors For Plant Growth On Fly Ash and Mine Waste mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unweathered fly ash fly ash and mine spoil, prevent wind erosion, decrease mobility, toxicity, and dispersion of chemical elements in the surrounding environment, provide the organic substance which can bind contaminants and reduce transfer of pollutants in the food web (DŽeletović and Filipović, 1995;Pavlović et al, 2004;Djurdjević et al, 2006;Mitrović et al, 2008;DŽeletović et al, 2009;Haynes, 2009;Pandey, 2012;Maiti, 2013;Pandey et al, 2015aPandey et al, ,b, 2016aGajić et al, 2016). Therefore, ecorestoration of degraded sites is the process of renewing ecosystem stability and resilience after stress or disturbance with respect to its health, integrity and sustainability (SER, 2002) presenting a key issue in environmental science and ecological engineering.…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving both physical and chemical properties appears crucial as the application of realistic quantities of inorganic fertilizer alone generally is not sufficient due to the immobilization of fertilizers' NPK in the receiving CCRs (Insam and Stalljann, 1989; Mulhern et al, 1989; Van Rensburg et al, 1998). Positive growth responses to inorganic fertilization have been reported only at application rates >480 kg ha −1 (Dzeletovic and Filipovic, 1995; Van Rensburg et al, 1998). The use of biosolids as an alternative to mineral fertilizers is potentially paralleled by a mobilization of As and Se (Jackson and Miller, 2000).…”
Section: Management Of Ccr Disposal Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radi sprečavanja raznošenja pepela vrši se biološka rekultivacija površina odlagališta setvom trava na nasipima aktivnih i pasivnih kaseta, kao i setvom na ravnim delovima pasivnih kaseta, uz sadnju različitih vrsta drveća i žbunova. Iako je reč o hroničnom i sinergističkom delovanju stresnih faktora (vodni deficit, nepovoljne fizičke i hemijske karakteristike pepela, teški metali u višku) na pepelištu, veliki broj različitih vrsta biljaka toleriše oštre ekološke uslove, i sa manje ili više teškoća opstaje i širi se na pepelu [1,2]. Pepeo ima veliku sposobnost infiltracije vode i u letnjim mesecima ne zadržava vlagu, tako da se biljke moraju prilagoditi sušnom okruženju i generalno slabije napreduju nego u prirodnom okruženju, pa se vrši plansko navodnjavanje.…”
unclassified
“…Pepeo ima veliku sposobnost infiltracije vode i u letnjim mesecima ne zadržava vlagu, tako da se biljke moraju prilagoditi sušnom okruženju i generalno slabije napreduju nego u prirodnom okruženju, pa se vrši plansko navodnjavanje. Sam proces setve zbog toga zahteva unošenje velikih količina semena trava i pojačano đubrenje sa većim normama azota u odnosu na klasičan pristup u poljoprivredi [1]. Rekultivacija je često diktirana i dostupnošću semenskog materijala specifičnih višegodišnjih travnih vrsta, otpornih na ekstremne agroekološke prilike odlagališta pepela.…”
unclassified