1988
DOI: 10.1051/jphyscol:1988527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GRAIN BOUNDARIES AND ANTIPHASE BOUNDARIES IN GaAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the observed Sˆ3 incoherent twin boundary should be a paratwin because the {111}, Sˆ3 coherent twin boundary must be an orthotwin with normal SiÐC bonds (Cho et al 1988). In this paper, we deal with only the paratwins.…”
Section: Atomic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the observed Sˆ3 incoherent twin boundary should be a paratwin because the {111}, Sˆ3 coherent twin boundary must be an orthotwin with normal SiÐC bonds (Cho et al 1988). In this paper, we deal with only the paratwins.…”
Section: Atomic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A rigid-body translation of one grain relative to the other is an important part of the atomic relaxation of a grain boundary. The presence of a rigid-body translation along the common h111i direction was found in Au (Ichinose et al 1985), Ag (for example Ernst et al (1992)), Cu (for example ), Al (for example Medlin et al (1993)), Si (Ichinose et al 1986) and Ge (Bourret and Bacmann 1986), whereas no rigid-body translation was found for diamond (Zhang et al 1996), SiC (for example Pirouz and Yang (1990)), GaAs (Cho et al 1988) and InP (Echigoya et al 1998), or under diOE erent conditions for Au (Ichinose et al 1985), Al (Pe nisson et al 1991) and Si (Ichinose et al 1986). It was also pointed out that the translation state was sensitive to the environment of the boundary (Ichinose et al 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The low energy data are included in the present analysis in the manner which follows closely the approach presented in [5,21]. Therefore only basic assumptions are listed here 6 For results which are based on the sample of events selected with | cos θ| < 0.9, this factor is reduced to 0.70866... and technical details are omitted.…”
Section: Data From Low Energy Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constraints from the µ ± C experiment result from the comparison of µ + L N and µ − R N cross sections. 8 This correction seems to be missing in [5,21].…”
Section: Data From Low Energy Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%