Grading by experience points: An example from computer ethics

Gehringer, Edward F.; Peddycord, Barry

doi:10.1109/fie.2013.6685097

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2014

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Book2

Other1

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is a good way for students to grapple with ethical issues that arise in their professional development [5,6]. Peer-assessment environments have also been designed for pedagogical code reviews [7] and exam practice questions [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Helping Students to Provide Effective Peer Feedback

Gehringer

2017 ASEE Annual Conference &Amp; Exposition Proceedings

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peer assessment is becoming more common across the curriculum. If it is to be effective, students need to know how to provide meaningful feedback. It is important to construct a rubric that draws students' attention to the important points of the work they are reviewing. But that is not enough; students also need instruction in how to provide comments that their peers can and will use in revising their work. This involves learning how to provide constructive suggestions. It also means understanding the way the author will react to the review, and using gentle enough terminology so that the words do not get in the way of understanding the reviewer's advice. Authors can also help reviewers learn the ropes by giving them feedback on the effectiveness of reviews of their work.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%