2018
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradient‐echo and spin‐echo blood oxygenation level–dependent functional MRI at ultrahigh fields of 9.4 and 15.2 Tesla

Abstract: SE-BOLD fMRI improves spatial specificity to microvessels compared to GE-BOLD at both fields. BOLD sensitivity is similar at the both fields and can be improved at ultrahigh fields only for thermal-noise-dominant ultrahigh-resolution fMRI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, GE-EPI is highly sensitive to large veins (Uludag et al, 2009), which makes this sequence spatially nonspecific as neurovascular coupling occurs at the level of the capillaries. This has been clearly demonstrated by fMRI studies in rats subjected to electrical stimulation of the forepaws, where the highest GE-EPI BOLD response is observed in the outer layer of the somatosensory cortex where pial vessels are located (Mandeville and Marota, 1999;Han et al, 2019), while neuronal activation mostly occurs in deeper cortical layers. The relative contribution of capillaries to the BOLD signal increases with field FIGURE 5 | Data acquisition.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, GE-EPI is highly sensitive to large veins (Uludag et al, 2009), which makes this sequence spatially nonspecific as neurovascular coupling occurs at the level of the capillaries. This has been clearly demonstrated by fMRI studies in rats subjected to electrical stimulation of the forepaws, where the highest GE-EPI BOLD response is observed in the outer layer of the somatosensory cortex where pial vessels are located (Mandeville and Marota, 1999;Han et al, 2019), while neuronal activation mostly occurs in deeper cortical layers. The relative contribution of capillaries to the BOLD signal increases with field FIGURE 5 | Data acquisition.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…GE-EPI provides a relatively high contrastto-noise ratio (CNR), which increases with field strength. At field strengths ≥ 7T, the intravascular contribution to the GE BOLD signal is negligible and signal changes scale almost linearly with echo time (TE) (Yacoub et al, 2003;Han et al, 2019). For optimal BOLD CNR, TE is typically set equal to the average gray matter tissue T2 * value (for an overview of brain tissue T2 and T2 * values we refer to Uludag et al (2009) and Han et al (2019).…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since higher magnetic field can enhance BOLD signals 54,55 , ultra-high field MRI has been used in some studies 39,56 . We used Spin Echo-Echo Planar Imaging (SE-EPI) sequence for high-resolution fMRI at ultra-high magnetic fields 55,57 . A custom-made surface coil for 14 T-MRI was attached to the operant learning device on top, and the coil centre was fitted to the mouse bregma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At ultrahigh magnetic field strengths (e.g., 7T), SE-fMRI has also been shown to provide improved spatial specificity when compared with GE-fMRI, as it enhances the relative sensitivity of the BOLD signal from the parenchyma. [12][13][14] Thus, SE-fMRI with enhanced spatial specificity can be useful to study brain organization and function at the cortical laminar or columnar levels. [15][16][17][18][19][20] However, high spatiotemporal resolution SE-fMRI is difficult due to the long echo time (TE) needed to generate BOLD contrast (TE ≈ T 2 of gray matter) 13,21 and associated long repetition times (TRs), along with higher specific absorption rate (SAR) from high flipangle pulses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%