2004
DOI: 10.1081/agb-120027926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graded Local Cohomology Modules and Their Associated Primes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But R is also Cohen-Macaulay by hypothesis, so dim M p = dim R p /I p = dim R p − htI p . By [L,Lemma 1.2.2], all minimal primes of I have the same height, so that, htI p = htI for each p. By combining the above arguments, we obtain…”
Section: Top Local Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But R is also Cohen-Macaulay by hypothesis, so dim M p = dim R p /I p = dim R p − htI p . By [L,Lemma 1.2.2], all minimal primes of I have the same height, so that, htI p = htI for each p. By combining the above arguments, we obtain…”
Section: Top Local Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Throughout this section we assume R and M are as in section 3. In particular, ht(R [L,Lemma 1.2.2], all minimal primes of I have the same height, so that, htI p = htI for each p. By combining the above arguments, we obtain…”
Section: Top Local Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the special case where R and M are both CM this is shown in [10]. Under additional mild restrictions on R 0 , we get the requested "local" extension of (1.4) to the case dim(R 0 ) = 2, namely (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%