1986
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1986.56.2.494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradation of isometric tension by different activation rates in motor units of cat flexor carpi radialis muscle

Abstract: Single motor units of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle were activated with a series of constant-rate stimulus trains to study the relation between the frequency of activation and isometric tension development (F-T relation). The tension produced by each stimulus train was expressed as a percentage of the maximum tension-time area (Amax) found for a given unit. Between 25 and 75% Amax a clear separation was seen in the rates needed to produce the same relative tension for the F-T curves of slow-twitch (ty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our obtained lags were shorter than other estimations (Botterman et al 1986) and similar between the two animals but were longer for acceleration phase [M1, 14.46 Ϯ 2.84 ms (mean Ϯ SD); M2, 16.46 Ϯ 3.07 ms] vs. deceleration phase (M1, 2.15 Ϯ 1.30 ms; M2, 4.07 Ϯ 2.59 ms). This is consistent with known muscle physiology, because 1) acceleration is produced by the rate of agonist shortening, whereas deceleration is controlled by the rate of antagonist lengthening; and 2) muscles develop forces faster during active lengthening than during active contractions (Brown and Loeb 2000).…”
Section: Part Ii: Dynamic Interval Analysis and Motion Termssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Our obtained lags were shorter than other estimations (Botterman et al 1986) and similar between the two animals but were longer for acceleration phase [M1, 14.46 Ϯ 2.84 ms (mean Ϯ SD); M2, 16.46 Ϯ 3.07 ms] vs. deceleration phase (M1, 2.15 Ϯ 1.30 ms; M2, 4.07 Ϯ 2.59 ms). This is consistent with known muscle physiology, because 1) acceleration is produced by the rate of agonist shortening, whereas deceleration is controlled by the rate of antagonist lengthening; and 2) muscles develop forces faster during active lengthening than during active contractions (Brown and Loeb 2000).…”
Section: Part Ii: Dynamic Interval Analysis and Motion Termssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For these movements it is vital to know the properties of parawhen excited at low rates. This has been demonstrated both for animal muscles 3,14 and for thenar lyzed intrinsic hand muscles. Furthermore, fatigue always develops more readily in response to constant motor units in intact human subjects.…”
Section: Figure 4 (A) M-wave Area Versus Twitch Force For Control (ϩmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Part of the difference likely arises from biomechanical differences in moving the eyes or head; for example, the head has a much greater inertia (Zangemeister and Stark 1981), and skeletal muscles take longer to develop forces compared with extraocular muscles (Barmack et al 1971;Botterman et al 1986). …”
Section: Comparison Of Antagonist Latencies and Ssrts And The Persistmentioning
confidence: 99%