Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1002/2015gl063769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GRACE gravity observations constrain Weichselian ice thickness in the Barents Sea

Abstract: The Barents Sea is subject to ongoing postglacial uplift since the melting of the Weichselian ice sheet that covered it. The regional ice sheet thickness history is not well known because there is only data at the periphery due to the locations of Franz Joseph Land, Svalbard, and Novaya Zemlya surrounding this paleo ice sheet. We show that the linear trend in the gravity rate derived from a decade of observations from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission can constrain the volum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model combines vertical land rates from Global Navigation Satellite System stations and relative sea level curves in a Bayesian framework to estimate the geoid changes induced by GIA, together with an associated standard error. In the Russian Arctic (RGI region 09), we use the model of Root et al (2015), which was specifically tailored for this region. To account for mass displacement in response to load changes since the Little Ice Age (LIA), which are not included in these GIA models, we use the LIA models of Larsen et al (2005) for Alaska (RGI region 01), Jacob et al (2012) High Mountain Asia (RGI region 13-15), and Ivins and James (2004) for the Southern Andes (RGI region 17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model combines vertical land rates from Global Navigation Satellite System stations and relative sea level curves in a Bayesian framework to estimate the geoid changes induced by GIA, together with an associated standard error. In the Russian Arctic (RGI region 09), we use the model of Root et al (2015), which was specifically tailored for this region. To account for mass displacement in response to load changes since the Little Ice Age (LIA), which are not included in these GIA models, we use the LIA models of Larsen et al (2005) for Alaska (RGI region 01), Jacob et al (2012) High Mountain Asia (RGI region 13-15), and Ivins and James (2004) for the Southern Andes (RGI region 17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that our LIA correction is smaller than that reported in their study (3 vs. 5.5 Gt yr −1 ), due to the different method to retrieve the mass changes from the GRACE data. Uncertainties for the GIA correction are based on the standard errors derived from the probability density function reported in Caron et al (2018), an ensemble of GIA solutions with varying ice loading history for the Russian Arctic (Root et al, 2015), and varying ice loading history and earth structure models for Iceland (Sørensen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the principle drivers of solid Earth deformation is GIA, and across regions that are currently ice-free, GRACE data (and measurements of the static gravity field by the 'Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer', GOCE) have been used to quantify the magnitude and spatial pattern of the local GIA signal (e.g. Tamisiea et al, 2007;Hill et al, 2010;Metivier et al, 2016), past ice thickness 415 (Root et al, 2015), and local viscosity structure (Paulson et al, 2007a). However, in areas where an ice sheet is still present variations in the local gravity field will reflect the solid Earth response to both past and present ice mass change, as well as contemporary changes to the mass of the ice sheet itself (Wahr et al, 2000).…”
Section: Gravity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the near future, improvements in data coverage will come through the application of novel analytical techniques in regions where sea-level reconstruction have so far proved challenging, e.g. mangroves, and the more widespread use of gravity data to constrain the GIA signal where sea-level and GPS data are lacking (Root et al, 2015). 730…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could result in biased inferences of ice thickness. Finally, the influence on gravity rates is also investigated, as gravity rates derived from the GRACE satellite mission constrain GIA in Scandinavia (Steffen et al, 2008;van der Wal et al, 2011) and the Barents Sea (Root et al, 2015a). To 15 compare with GRACE data a maximum spherical harmonic degree of 60 is used in the GIA model, which is the same truncation used in many GRACE studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%