2013
DOI: 10.3233/xst-130366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPU based iterative cone-beam CT reconstruction using empty space skipping technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the implementations of these iterative methods, the line integrals of images ftrue(ntrue) and gtrue(ntrue) were calculated by a ray casting method, and back‐projection in formula (11) was performed by a pixel driven method. The ray‐driven and voxel‐driven techniques favor the current GPU architecture, and can be implemented in a great speed by exploiting the parallelism of GPU (Zhu et al ., , Zhao et al ., ). To reconstruct the above images of size 512 × 512 pixels using 720 projections, each of 512 detector cells, MDIR, E‐ART and E‐SART spent almost the same amount of time (0.165 s) in calculating low‐ and high‐energy polychromatic forward projections and updating current density images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the implementations of these iterative methods, the line integrals of images ftrue(ntrue) and gtrue(ntrue) were calculated by a ray casting method, and back‐projection in formula (11) was performed by a pixel driven method. The ray‐driven and voxel‐driven techniques favor the current GPU architecture, and can be implemented in a great speed by exploiting the parallelism of GPU (Zhu et al ., , Zhao et al ., ). To reconstruct the above images of size 512 × 512 pixels using 720 projections, each of 512 detector cells, MDIR, E‐ART and E‐SART spent almost the same amount of time (0.165 s) in calculating low‐ and high‐energy polychromatic forward projections and updating current density images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…All iterative methods involve at least a single back-and forwardprojection, in addition to correcting noise penalties in the reconstruction domain. Recent studies have focused on achieving faster convergence on the convex optimizer; however, at least 20 iterations are required in order to achieve clinically usable image quality (15)(16)(17). Although a significant amount of computational time can be reduced by parallelizing the process of forwardand back-projection operation using a Graphical Processing Unit (GPU), significant (>80%) amount of the time is still spent on calculating forward-and back-projection and the time is significant (>1 s).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in Section 2.1, storing the entire system matrix in a single GPU is infeasible. Existing proposals use dynamic approaches that calculate the system matrix on the y [24,39]. However, these approaches introduce large computational overhead due to repeated on-the-y computations during iterative image reconstruction [11].…”
Section: Sparse Matrix Compression and Spmvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For CT image reconstruction, many researchers have also looked into how to leverage GPUs. For example, Pang et al [24] propose a ray-voxel hybrid driven method to map SART onto GPU architecture, while Zhao et al [39] propose a CUDA-based GPU approach that includes empty-space skipping and a multi-resolution technique to accelerate ART. However, both approaches require a signicant amount of memory due to their lack of awareness of the sparse algebra computational paern and the need to have to calculate weighting factors on the y.…”
Section: Gpu-based Ct Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation