2016
DOI: 10.1002/sca.21306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extended simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (E‐SART) for X‐ray dual spectral computed tomography

Abstract: X-ray dual spectral computed tomography (DSCT) scans the measured object with two different x-ray energy spectra and the collected polychromatic projections from this procedure can be used to perform basis material decomposition of the object. An iterative method E-ART was recently proposed to produce highly quantitative basis material images for DSCT, but it has the drawback of slow convergence and huge computational costs. Inspired by the E-ART method, this paper proposes an extended simultaneous algebraic r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(C)). As comparisons, we also implement the image-based method, empirical dual energy calibration (EDEC) method (Stenner et al, 2007), nonlocal means filter based (NLM) method (Zeng et al, 2016b), weighted least square and nonlocal means based (WLS-NLM) method (Zhang et al, 2017), material decomposition from inconsistent rays (MDIR) (Maaβ et al, 2009b), and E-SART method (Zhao et al, 2015, Hu et al, 2016), covering all the decomposition categories and including both conventional and state-of-the-art methods. The corresponding descriptions and comparisons are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3(C)). As comparisons, we also implement the image-based method, empirical dual energy calibration (EDEC) method (Stenner et al, 2007), nonlocal means filter based (NLM) method (Zeng et al, 2016b), weighted least square and nonlocal means based (WLS-NLM) method (Zhang et al, 2017), material decomposition from inconsistent rays (MDIR) (Maaβ et al, 2009b), and E-SART method (Zhao et al, 2015, Hu et al, 2016), covering all the decomposition categories and including both conventional and state-of-the-art methods. The corresponding descriptions and comparisons are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2016, Hu et al extended the E-ART method into an simultaneous version, i.e. E-SART (Hu et al, 2016). This method is based on the matrix inversion and has a high degree of parallelism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…40 Multi-domain methods often choose the basis material component images as the searchedfor tuning objective. 41,42 On one hand, an approximate model is established to describe the nonlinear relationship between the acquired projection datasets and the searched-for decomposed material images. On the other hand, spectral distribution needs to be estimated in advance, and some prior knowledge is often introduced to improve the ill-posedness and suppress noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several multi‐domain methods are proposed with statistical models and nonlinear optimizations 40 . Multi‐domain methods often choose the basis material component images as the searched‐for tuning objective 41,42 . On one hand, an approximate model is established to describe the nonlinear relationship between the acquired projection datasets and the searched‐for decomposed material images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%