2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPS-based monitoring of surface deformation associated with CO2 injection at an enhanced oil recovery site

Abstract: High precision GPS measurements have been used to measure surface deformation associated with CO2 injection at an Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) field in South Texas.We describe a filtering procedure to reduce noise associated with seasonal hydrologic effects, achieving post-filter precisions of better than 2 mm and 3 mm in horizontal and © 2015. This manuscript version is made available under the Elsevier user license http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ 2 vertical components respectively. A mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the best-fit Young's moduli derived from the low and medium pressure conditions (6 GPa and 10 GPa) are quite small compared to the best-fit Young's modulus derived from the high-pressure condition (18 GPa), and are on the low side of plausible crustal values. A similar deformation study in south Texas (Karegar et al, 2015) where pressure data were available for calibration gave a best estimate of average Young's modulus of 55 GPa +80/−20 GPa; at 95% confidence, the minimum estimate obtained in that study was 15 GPa, similar to our high estimate. We therefore take the estimate of 18 GPa as the most plausible value for Young's modulus and the corresponding estimate of the high-pressure buildup condition (up to 10 MPa) as the best pressure change estimate.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the best-fit Young's moduli derived from the low and medium pressure conditions (6 GPa and 10 GPa) are quite small compared to the best-fit Young's modulus derived from the high-pressure condition (18 GPa), and are on the low side of plausible crustal values. A similar deformation study in south Texas (Karegar et al, 2015) where pressure data were available for calibration gave a best estimate of average Young's modulus of 55 GPa +80/−20 GPa; at 95% confidence, the minimum estimate obtained in that study was 15 GPa, similar to our high estimate. We therefore take the estimate of 18 GPa as the most plausible value for Young's modulus and the corresponding estimate of the high-pressure buildup condition (up to 10 MPa) as the best pressure change estimate.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…If the pressure change is large enough, the surface deformation may be measurable. In principle, the measured surface deformation can be inverted to estimate pressure changes at depth and track the CO 2 plume (e.g., Vasco et al, 2008Vasco et al, , 2010Rinaldi and Rutqvist, 2013;White et al, 2014;Karegar et al, 2015). Over long periods (decades or centuries), chemical reactions that result in formation of mineral phases will cause pressure and volume reduction and subsidence, and could not be distinguished from migration or leakage with this technique alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other techniques include optical-instrument leveling, tiltmeter-based measurements and Global positioning system (GPS) (e.g. Karegar et al, 2015). Each technique has pros and cons and can be combined with each other for a more comprehensive characterization of the surface deformations (e.g.…”
Section: Specificity Regarding the Monitoring Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For larger areas, the amplitude and phase of the vertical and horizontal components of the deformation are better explained with a spherical nonrotating elastic layered Earth model (Chanard et al, ). In addition, if the spatial extent of the load is large, the Young's modulus may have to be unrealistically increased to include more distant loads in the computation (e.g., Chanard et al, ; Fu & Freymueller, ; Karegar et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various types of geophysical fluid loads (atmosphere, ocean, and cryosphere), hydrological loading often represents the dominant signal in the vertical component, especially at multiannual and shorter periods (e.g., Fritsche et al, ; Jiang et al, ). Accurate modeling of these effects in position time series is therefore beneficial for reliable long‐term surface velocity estimates (Klos et al, ; Santamaría‐Gómez & Mémin, ) and noise analysis (Bogusz & Klos, ; Davis et al, 2012; Santamaría‐Gómez et al, ), as well as studies of tectonic processes (Bennett, 2008; Blewitt & Lavallée, ; Bos et al, ; Vergnolle et al, ), volcanic processes (Henderson & Pritchard, ), geodynamics (Chanard et al, ; Clarke, ), sea level rise (Santamaría‐Gómez et al, ), geomechanics (Karegar et al, ), and reference frame definition (Collilieux et al, ; Krásná et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%