2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/6429430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPS, Accelerometer, and Smartphone Fused Smart Sensor for SHM on Real‐Scale Bridges

Abstract: During the last two decades, Global Positioning System (GPS) geodetic-grade receivers and accelerometers have been implemented in Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). Most recently, the use of sensors integrated in smartphones has been evolving. Although some of their capabilities are validated for small and local structures, there is a gap in knowledge about the use of sensors embedded in smartphones and other electronic devices for SHM of complex structures as bridges. To contribute in this area, this paper d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some sensors integrated inside the smartphone may contribute valuable information for SHM [11,30]. Moreover, most modern smartphones' hardware capacity and perfor-mance are sufficient for data analysis, if the corresponding software is adapted [17]. However, most of these sensors are installed or glued at the surface of the structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some sensors integrated inside the smartphone may contribute valuable information for SHM [11,30]. Moreover, most modern smartphones' hardware capacity and perfor-mance are sufficient for data analysis, if the corresponding software is adapted [17]. However, most of these sensors are installed or glued at the surface of the structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the downside, these systems are too costly to construct, the sensors cannot be calibrated periodically, and the layout of monitoring points is limited by local terrain and structure type. e geometric deformation of the bridge structure can only be collected by a few discrete monitoring points, making it difficult to characterize the local or global holographic geometry of bridge safety [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the downside, these systems are too costly to construct, the sensors cannot be calibrated periodically, and the layout of monitoring points is limited by a local terrain and the structure type. The geometric deformation of the bridge structure can only be collected by a few discrete monitoring points, making it difficult to characterize the local or global holographic geometry of bridge safety [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%