2003
DOI: 10.4133/jeeg8.2.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPR Pulse Attenuation in a Fine-Grained and Partially Contaminated Formation

Abstract: We have determined attenuation rates and relative dielectric permittivities of a fine-grained sediment formation, part of which was contaminated by hydrocarbons. Our purpose was to test previous laboratory documentation of the effects of probable adsorption and∕or capillary tension on the electrical properties of water at a common ground-penetrating radar center frequency of [Formula: see text]. The formation is a saturated, and dense glacio-marine diamicton that had a small area partially contaminated by jet … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption that the embedded wavelets are stationary within the estimation and application data window is critical for reliable deconvolution. Whereas dispersive attenuation was considered to be insignificant for our field data example, wavelet dispersion and frequency-dependent attenuation are observed in GPR data, for example for clay-rich sediments (e.g., Arcone et al, 2008) or contaminated formations (e.g., Arcone et al, 2003). In cases of non-stationary wavelets, either dispersion removal techniques (e.g., Irving and Knight, 2003) can be applied beforehand or a time-varying deconvolution procedure can be carried out (e.g., van der Baan and Fomel, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption that the embedded wavelets are stationary within the estimation and application data window is critical for reliable deconvolution. Whereas dispersive attenuation was considered to be insignificant for our field data example, wavelet dispersion and frequency-dependent attenuation are observed in GPR data, for example for clay-rich sediments (e.g., Arcone et al, 2008) or contaminated formations (e.g., Arcone et al, 2003). In cases of non-stationary wavelets, either dispersion removal techniques (e.g., Irving and Knight, 2003) can be applied beforehand or a time-varying deconvolution procedure can be carried out (e.g., van der Baan and Fomel, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies focus on guided waves in single profiles. Few studies highlight the analysis of guided-wave phenomena in a roll-along profile, as is done by Arcone et al (2003a) to estimate attenuation rates. Here, we briefly review previous research on GPR guided waves.…”
Section: Previous Work On Gpr Guided Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%