2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Government ownership and corporate governance: Evidence from the EU

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
174
3
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
174
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the other study McConnell and Servaes (1990) mentioned that the relationship between insider ownership and performance is not linear, but they found that insider ownership always have positive effect on firm performance. Borisova et al (2012) investigated the impact of government ownership structure on corporate governance. Their finding showed that government ownership is related with lower governance quality and it is negatively influence the firm's corporate governance.…”
Section: Ownership Structure Risk Taking and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the other study McConnell and Servaes (1990) mentioned that the relationship between insider ownership and performance is not linear, but they found that insider ownership always have positive effect on firm performance. Borisova et al (2012) investigated the impact of government ownership structure on corporate governance. Their finding showed that government ownership is related with lower governance quality and it is negatively influence the firm's corporate governance.…”
Section: Ownership Structure Risk Taking and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Governments intervene and implement reforms and take corrective actions that bring the efficiency and stability to the financial system. This led regulators to conduct new cautious standards, in order to create healthier and stronger bank governance [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to Sovereign Wealth Funds, other relatively new intuitions have recently become important equity owners alongside the more traditional investors, such as pension funds and investment funds. In a similar vein, Bortolotti et al (2014) suggest that SWFs are the single most important expression of the force that can be called the rise of the fi duciary state. What makes this phenomenon especially signifi cant is the fact that the largest number of government equity purchases have been acquisitions in foreign companies, where a state purchaser has limited ability to exercise any sovereign regulatory or supervisory power.…”
Section: Institutional Investment In Global Financial Marketsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Much of this state investment was channeled through special investment vehicles -Sovereign Wealth Funds, and the vast bulk of stock purchases have been cross border transactions. SWFs have been buying non-controlling stakes in foreign and domestic companies in order to realize a longterm fi nancial return, rather than to own and operate these businesses as state enterprises (Bortolotti, Fotak, & Megginson, 2014).…”
Section: Institutional Investment In Global Financial Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%