Government Communication Strategies during Coronavirus Pandemic: United Arab Emirates Lessons

Abstract

Government communication introduced important lessons during the worldwide experience with the COVID-19 pandemic. It is important to apply known efficacious principles of risk and health communication strategies. The purpose of the study is to depict and explore the United Arab Emirates government communication scenario in tackling the COVID-19 pandemic as well as look at the types of strategies, information and messages delivered via digital mediums to handle challenges that are raised based on the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication model. The study includes a qualitative analysis of two government bodies’ digital platforms: ‘The Ministry of Health and Prevention’ (mohap) and ‘Crisis and Disasters Management Authority’. Results indicated that the UAE government used different communication aims and strategies to face the pandemic according to the risk management scenario. In the quarantine phase, communication focused on giving people information about the disease, raising awareness about the disease, motivating health and behaviour change, informing people about government decisions and procedures. In the coexistence phase communication focused on emphasising the necessity of adherence the health measures, providing information on re-work in institutions and commercial centres, involving people in the health and social initiatives, confronting non-compliance with health precautions. Government communication also focused on facing rumours and false information. UAE government communication used digital platforms and social media to address more than 200 nationalities living in the state for ensuring that they adhere to the precautionary measures and coordinate with the authorities. Government communication was committed to a set of values including equality between citizens of the state and residents, societal and individual responsibility, recognising the frontline medical staff and acknowledging their sacrifices. UAE implemented an integrated, coherent and effective scenario to deal with the crisis. It developed risk communication strategies in health communication to manage the COVID-19 crisis by following international standards and also took into account its own political, economic, social and cultural features. The UAE government used many strategies to inform and convince people including clarification of measures strategy, reassurance strategy, ambiguity reduction strategy, behaviour efficacy strategy, correcting misinformation and rumours, advising strategy.

Can risk communication in mass media improve compliance behavior in the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from Vietnam

“…During the COVID-19 pandemic, risk communication in Vietnam refers to the exchange of health information, advice and opinions between experts or officials and the public before, during and after the emergency phase to control and manage risk, which is in line with the WHO guideline and literature (Covello et al, 1986;WHO, 2017;Wang et al, 2021;Radwan and Mousa, 2021). During the COVID-19 pandemic, especially the nationwide social distancing period, government risk communication in Vietnam has been praised for being timely, clear, accurate, transparent, consistent and creative (Duong et al, 2020).…”

Does Citizen Engagement With Government Social Media Accounts Differ During the Different Stages of Public Health Crises? An Empirical Examination of the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…During global health crises, such as COVID-19, government communication must encourage active public participation and attach significant attention to citizens' demands and expectations, while keeping information transparent and inclusive ( 3 ). If citizens do not participate and comply with government's responses, communication during the crisis can be deemed a failure, and government responses and emergency management are likely to face further challenges ( 4 ).…”

Government communication in times of crisis: The priorities and trends in South Africa’s response to COVID-19

“…Other studies also show how communication shaped vulnerability and wellbeing during the pandemic. 19,20 The key legislative frameworks for disaster management in South Africa are the South African Disaster Management Act (DMA) 57 of 2002, amended Act 16, 2015 21,22 and the National Disaster Management Framework (NDMF) of 2005. 23 The DMA, supported by the NDMF, required the establishment of a national disaster management centre, which will operate in collaboration with disaster management centres at the provincial and municipal levels to proactively manage disaster risks, mitigate the impact of disasters and assist communities in recovering post disasters.…”