New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5831-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governance – A Sociological Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The technocratic pathway builds on the consequentialist assumption that higher investments in resources relate to higher compliance in implementation (cf. Wittek ; see also Entwistle ). An alternative framework to explain compliant change emphasizes normative legitimation of organizational processes and active bottom‐up involvement of organizational members (Rainey ; Wittek and van de Bunt ).…”
Section: Theory: Implementation Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technocratic pathway builds on the consequentialist assumption that higher investments in resources relate to higher compliance in implementation (cf. Wittek ; see also Entwistle ). An alternative framework to explain compliant change emphasizes normative legitimation of organizational processes and active bottom‐up involvement of organizational members (Rainey ; Wittek and van de Bunt ).…”
Section: Theory: Implementation Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some commentators make a case for a positive relation between resource availability, incentives, and organizational performance (Jackson ; cf. Wittek ). It is argued, for instance, that sizeable budgets provide flexibility in response to environmental changes, and improve organizational capacity to adopt and implement new policies (Bowman and Hurry ; De Lancer Julnes and Holzer ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policies to improve commitment are more complex (not as simple as it may seem). There are numerous bases for commitment: deterrence (coercive), remuneration (incentive), associational (social), and moral (normative), and these form the theoretical foundations for most enforcement policies [76] [77].…”
Section: How To Enforce the Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pochi casi, tuttavia, la scuola promuove, attraverso il coinvolgimento delle famiglie, «iniziative aperte al territorio», ciò ad indicare che le azioni di governance (Wittek, Schimank, & Groß, 2007;MIUR, 2009;Chiappetta Cajola, 2015;Chiappetta Cajola & Traversetti, 2016b) non sono specificamente finalizzate alla promozione del metodo di studio. Probabilmente, ciò è dovuto al fatto che tale promozione è ritenuta ambito di pertinenza prettamente degli insegnanti e, quindi, compito specifico ed esclusivo della scuola.…”
Section: Dirigenti Scolasticiunclassified