2019
DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gothic <r> and Old High German <r>: Implications from phonological patterning

Abstract: This article reconstructs the archaic Germanic rhotic by examining a natural class pattern common to Gothic and Old High German (OHG). Specifically, I argue that the sounds represented by the graphemes and patterned as [high] segments. Due to the Obligatory Contour Principle, those [high] consonants triggered dissimilatory lowering of high vowels in Gothic. On account of the No-Crossing Constraint, the same (i.e. etymologically related) consonants blocked the OHG process known as Primary Umlaut. That … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the phonetic features of /r/, both Braune/Heidermanns (2018: 114, fn. 4) and Kostakis (2019) adduce supporting evidence from Gothic, but the former postulates an alveolar realization, while the latter argues convincingly for a velar realization.…”
Section: Lengthening In the Open Syllable Of Disyllablesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…On the phonetic features of /r/, both Braune/Heidermanns (2018: 114, fn. 4) and Kostakis (2019) adduce supporting evidence from Gothic, but the former postulates an alveolar realization, while the latter argues convincingly for a velar realization.…”
Section: Lengthening In the Open Syllable Of Disyllablesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, if blocking effects in metaphonic processes are taken to be the result of a well-motivated cross-linguistic principle like the no-crossing constraint (in the sense of Goldsmith 1976), the implication of the analysis presented for OHG is that such consonants must be marked with height features. See additional discussion in Kostakis (2019) and Kostakis & Noelliste (2022). 30 In each form in (26), the initial stressed syllable contains an <e>.…”
Section: Metaphony In Ohgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change is left open here since the new vowels have no direct etymological connection to the mid vowels in the other branches and thus may differ structurally. An analysis of the change additionally requires representations for <r>, <h>, and <ƕ>, which goes beyond the scope of this article (see discussion in Vennemann 1972, Howell 1988, and Kostakis 2019 for additional details and analysis).…”
Section: Egmcmentioning
confidence: 99%