1996
DOI: 10.1177/107769909607300406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Good News from a Bad Neighborhood: Toward an Alternative to the Discourse of Urban Pathology

Abstract: This study analyzes the language through which journalists comprehend the nature and meaning of the urban community. It employs content analysis and interviews with reporters to critique the discourse of urban pathology - that is, the conceptual system often used to think and write about economically distressed neighborhoods. Rather than suggesting that all the “bad news “from these neighborhoods merely be balanced with “good news,” this study promotes a vocabulary of community assets - a set of terms that can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such “degrading marks” on communities evolve through characterizations casting them as undesirable places without resources, capacity, or inherent value [44, 49]. These portrayals are further perpetuated through media coverage and academic discourse, which variously describe disadvantaged communities as “poverty-stricken,” “crime-ridden,” “vulnerable,” and “needy” [50]. Characterizations such as these can create a double jeopardy for groups already dealing with significant health challenges, as they can send the unintended message that the very communities most in need of social and economic investment are instead hopeless and beyond repair.…”
Section: The Dohad Communication Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such “degrading marks” on communities evolve through characterizations casting them as undesirable places without resources, capacity, or inherent value [44, 49]. These portrayals are further perpetuated through media coverage and academic discourse, which variously describe disadvantaged communities as “poverty-stricken,” “crime-ridden,” “vulnerable,” and “needy” [50]. Characterizations such as these can create a double jeopardy for groups already dealing with significant health challenges, as they can send the unintended message that the very communities most in need of social and economic investment are instead hopeless and beyond repair.…”
Section: The Dohad Communication Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Participation in local institutions and use of ''local assets'' facilitate social and civic engagement (Ettema & Peer, 1996;Mastin, 2000). .…”
Section: Revealing Community Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, in the process, certain civic opportunities are believed to be thwarted. For example, news frames (a) constrain economically distressed communities from seeing their assets (Ettema & Peer, 1996); (b) constrict political awareness of individuals (Gamson, 1992(Gamson, , 1996; (c) thwart the aims of social movement groups (Meyer, 1995;Molotch, 1977;Pride, 1995;Snow & Benford, 1992); and (d) set parameters for policy debates not necessarily in agreement with democratic norms (Andsager, 2000;Ashley & Olson, 1998;Hornig, 1992;Jasperson et al, 1998;Goshorn & Gandy, 1995;Norris, 1995;Pan & Kosicki, 1993;Terkildsen, Schnell, & Ling, 1998;Tulloch & Chapman, 1992).…”
Section: News Framing Paradigms In Comparative Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%