1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1985.tb02880.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gonococcal Serovar Distribution in Stockholm, with Special Reference to Multiple Infections and Infected Partners

Abstract: Serological classification with co‐agglutination, using monoclonal antibody reagents, was used to classify gonococcal strains from 731 consecutive patients seen at the Venereal Outpatients clinic at the Department of Dermatology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, up to April 1983. The strains could be divided into two serogroups, WI and WII/III. For the identification of strains belonging to serogroup WI, six Protein IA specific antibody reagents were used, and for strains of serogroup WII/III, seven Protein IB speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The serovar determination system seemed reliable in that only 19 of 181 patients diagnosed with isolates from more than one location at the same time were infected with isolates of different serovars (paper IV). This is also in concordance with earlier studies [101]. Fifteen of the 19 patients had serovars that differed in more than one reaction with the monoclonal reagents.…”
Section: Typing Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The serovar determination system seemed reliable in that only 19 of 181 patients diagnosed with isolates from more than one location at the same time were infected with isolates of different serovars (paper IV). This is also in concordance with earlier studies [101]. Fifteen of the 19 patients had serovars that differed in more than one reaction with the monoclonal reagents.…”
Section: Typing Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It can also be used in the control of therapeutic trials, e.g. in the evaluation of treatment failure versus reinfection (7) and to separate strains in cases of double infections (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%