2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gone after one orbit: How cluster environments quench galaxies

Abstract: The effect of galactic orbits on a galaxy's internal evolution within a galaxy cluster environment has been the focus of heated debate in recent years. To understand this connection, we use both the (0.5 Gpc) 3 and the Gpc 3 boxes from the cosmological hydrodynamical simulation set Magneticum Pathfinder. We investigate the velocityanisotropy, phase space, and the orbital evolution of up to ∼ 5 · 10 5 resolved satellite galaxies within our sample of 6776 clusters with M vir > 10 14 M ⊙ at low redshift, which we… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
113
3
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
20
113
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…When the range of (log) pericenters is wide, the velocity anisotropy at a given radius r is dominated by the orbits with pericenters much smaller than r, which are near radial at r. But in the limit of a unique pericenter, the velocity anisotropy of spirals would be fully tangential (i.e., circular) at r = r peri , rapidly increasing with radius to the radial values caused by infall (if the apocenters were all equal, one would return to circular at r = r apo ). This rapid transition in the velocity anisotropy profile is seen in recent hydrodynamical simulations (Lotz et al 2019). But, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Isotropizationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…When the range of (log) pericenters is wide, the velocity anisotropy at a given radius r is dominated by the orbits with pericenters much smaller than r, which are near radial at r. But in the limit of a unique pericenter, the velocity anisotropy of spirals would be fully tangential (i.e., circular) at r = r peri , rapidly increasing with radius to the radial values caused by infall (if the apocenters were all equal, one would return to circular at r = r apo ). This rapid transition in the velocity anisotropy profile is seen in recent hydrodynamical simulations (Lotz et al 2019). But, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Isotropizationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Their main finding showed that radial gas fractions decrease with decreasing cluster-centric distance, and contamination from backsplash and pre-processed galaxies (which will also increase with decreasing cluster-centric distance) brings the distribution down. This is in disagreement with Lotz et al (2019) and Arthur et al (2019), who find that the instantaneous gas fraction does decline radially, but the gas in (sub)haloes is lost on first passage, rather than contamination being the cause for the radial decline. In fact, in Arthur et al (2019), it was postulated that the majority of gas in infalling objects is stripped by some sort of accretion shock at 1.5-2R 200 , where R 200 is the radius of the halo at 200 times the critical density of the universe at that redshift.…”
contrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Our results show that, at similar radii, half of the gas of the infalling objects is already gone. As we do not make a distinction between relaxed and unrelaxed galaxy clusters, we expect that the contamination by these populations does not alter our trends by a substantial amount and therefore we conclude that most fractional gas-loss from infalling objects is lost on first infall (see Lotz et al 2019) at a characteristic radius.…”
Section: How Gas-loss Since Infall Relates To Cluster-centric Distancementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Moreover, recent studies indicate that galaxies are systematically more quenched in cosmic filaments around clusters, than their counterparts from other isotropic directions (see for example, Martínez et al 2016;Salerno et al 2019;Sarron et al 2019). In fact, Lotz et al (2019) found that star-forming galaxies are in majority quenched during their first orbit around clusters in Magneticum simulation. Two main possible scenarios can potentially explain a stronger quenching of galaxies in comic filaments at cluster peripheries: either passive galaxies fall more rapidly inside galaxy clusters, since they are located closer to filament spin (Laigle et al 2018;Kraljic et al 2018); or the quenching efficiency is stronger in filaments around clusters due to a larger probability to merge, and to be accreted by small galaxy groups.…”
Section: The Dependency On Galaxy Activity (In Case 1 and 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%