2013
DOI: 10.1260/1747-9541.8.1.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Going beyond Won-Loss Record to Identify Successful Coaches: Development and Preliminary Validation of the Coaching Success Questionnaire-2

Abstract: The Coaching Success Questionnaire-2 (CSQ-2) was developed to provide a global assessment of coaches' ability to develop critical athlete outcomes (e.g., self-confidence). Study 1 examined the responses of 212 collegiate athletes on the 106-item CSQ-2A, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) results provided empirical guidance for modification and refinement of the instrument. Study 2 utilized EFA and covariance modeling to examine the responses of 352 participants on the 76-item CSQ-2B, resulting in the final … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these instruments, such as CBQ, only measure certain coaching behaviors (e.g., negative activation and supportiveness, and emotional composure) and targeted scenarios (e.g., competition against a top opponent) rather than a more holistic view of the range of coaching behaviors, which has obvious limitations. 18 On the other hand, the Coaching Competency Scale, 18 Coaching Competency Scale II -High School Teams, 19 and Coaching Success Questionniare-2 20 have provided evidence to support athletes' evaluation of their coach's abilities to influence athletes' learning outcomes (e.g., self-confidence) 20 and performance, and predict athletes' satisfaction with the coach. 11 Nonetheless, more research is warranted to investigate the utility of coaching competency and other well-defined instruments within broader conceptions of coaching effectiveness to advance our knowledge in this field of research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these instruments, such as CBQ, only measure certain coaching behaviors (e.g., negative activation and supportiveness, and emotional composure) and targeted scenarios (e.g., competition against a top opponent) rather than a more holistic view of the range of coaching behaviors, which has obvious limitations. 18 On the other hand, the Coaching Competency Scale, 18 Coaching Competency Scale II -High School Teams, 19 and Coaching Success Questionniare-2 20 have provided evidence to support athletes' evaluation of their coach's abilities to influence athletes' learning outcomes (e.g., self-confidence) 20 and performance, and predict athletes' satisfaction with the coach. 11 Nonetheless, more research is warranted to investigate the utility of coaching competency and other well-defined instruments within broader conceptions of coaching effectiveness to advance our knowledge in this field of research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these stages will not be detailed in depth, extensive evidence [2,[7][8][9][10] for the demonstrated effectiveness of this approach to traditional mental skills training can be found in the sport and exercise psychology literature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gillham's PhD dissertation involved the creation of a questionnaire that focused on the coach's impact on winning during competitions. 8 It was intended to provide coaches, athletic directors, and consultants with valuable information to improve team or individual performance. 9 According to Gillham, the practical and easy to understand nature of this instrument helped to open a lot of doors early in his career.…”
Section: Evidence-based Coaching: Moving From Theory To Practicementioning
confidence: 99%