God and gratuitous evil (Part II)

Abstract

In contemporary analytic philosophy, the problem of evil refers to a family of arguments that attempt to show, by appeal to evil, that God does not (or probably does not) exist. Some very important arguments in this family focus on gratuitous evil. Most participants in the relevant discussions, including theists and atheists, agree that God is able to prevent all gratuitous evil, and that God would do so. On this view, of course, the occurrence of even a single instance of gratuitous evil falsifies theism. The most common response to such arguments attempts to cast doubt on the claim that gratuitous evil really occurs. The focus of these two survey papers will be a different response – one that has received less attention in the literature. This response attempts to show that God and gratuitous evil are compatible. If it succeeds, then the occurrence of gratuitous evil does not, after all, count against theism. In the prequel to this paper, I surveyed the literature surrounding the attempts by Michael Peterson and John Hick to execute this strategy. Here, I survey the attempts due to William Hasker, Peter van Inwagen, and Michael Almeida, respectively.

Idolatry, indifference, and the scientific study of religion: two new Humean arguments

“…Here, we've adapted Kraay (2016)’s discussion of gratuitous evil in order to develop our notion of a gratuitous inclination to idolatry 4 . Nonetheless, gratuitous inclinations to idolatry need not be gratuitous evils and our argument should not be understood as an instance of an evidential argument from evil.…”

Skeptical Theism Unscathed: Why Skeptical Objections to Skeptical Theism Fail

“…Van Inwagen (), Meghan Sullivan (), Daniel Rubio (), and William Hasker () have put forth powerful challenges to it. For an overview of the debate about theism and gratuitous evil, see Klaas Kraay () and ().…”