2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511921650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

God's Empire

Abstract: Greater Britain -the English-speaking settler colonies of the British empire which we are more likely now to refer to as the British world -was an idea as much as a set of territories. 1 For the free Christian churches of the peoples of Great Britain and Ireland, it was also a mission field. This is a novel idea and one which I hope to argue throughout the course of this book. Chapter 1 begins by examining the idea of Greater Britain , first as a concept in the writing of Charles Wentworth Dilke , and then as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…135 As Hilary Carey has shown, in the nineteenth-century British world "emigration and colonization had a religious dimension"; the colonial missionary societies of Anglican, Nonconformist and Roman Catholic churches were deeply committed to following white settlers leaving the British Isles for the Empire, planting their theological and social distinctions along with a common "Christian ethos" within colonial communities. 136 Such church missions were each motivated to make British settlers "a better, more Christian, people," retaining their own specific vision of what constituted Christian life and practice. 137 The destinations of Israelite preachers after first evangelising in the British Isles -to Australia, New Zealand, and Cape Colony especially -indicate a comparable mission, not only in the effort to plant a British religious tradition in settler soil, but also in the promotion of a precise version of Christian living and worship.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…135 As Hilary Carey has shown, in the nineteenth-century British world "emigration and colonization had a religious dimension"; the colonial missionary societies of Anglican, Nonconformist and Roman Catholic churches were deeply committed to following white settlers leaving the British Isles for the Empire, planting their theological and social distinctions along with a common "Christian ethos" within colonial communities. 136 Such church missions were each motivated to make British settlers "a better, more Christian, people," retaining their own specific vision of what constituted Christian life and practice. 137 The destinations of Israelite preachers after first evangelising in the British Isles -to Australia, New Zealand, and Cape Colony especially -indicate a comparable mission, not only in the effort to plant a British religious tradition in settler soil, but also in the promotion of a precise version of Christian living and worship.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…136 Such church missions were each motivated to make British settlers "a better, more Christian, people," retaining their own specific vision of what constituted Christian life and practice. 137 The destinations of Israelite preachers after first evangelising in the British Isles -to Australia, New Zealand, and Cape Colony especially -indicate a comparable mission, not only in the effort to plant a British religious tradition in settler soil, but also in the promotion of a precise version of Christian living and worship. The political independence from "the British world" of the United States was irrelevant to Israelite interest in the country: there remained a large British population with whom it was important to share their prophetic message.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first is that a hierarchy does in fact exist since religious discrimination has unfairly been given a lower priority than other characteristics, particularly sexual orientation, as can be seen from cases where there is a clash of rights (see, e.g. Carey and Carey, 2012). The second argument has a very different starting point: religion or belief is inherently different from other protected characteristics, perhaps because it is a choice rather than an inherent characteristic of an individual and certainly because religions or beliefs place extensive obligations for behaviour on their adherents (see, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%