2016
DOI: 10.1177/1358229115627518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious discrimination and the ‘hierarchy of rights’

Abstract: In theory, there is no hierarchy of rights in the Equality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…46 Middlemiss (2018);. 47 Pearson (2016); Hatzis (2011);TUC Report (2007);Azmi v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 Middlemiss (2018);. 47 Pearson (2016); Hatzis (2011);TUC Report (2007);Azmi v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, it has been argued (Hambler, 2015) that religion and belief are treated less favourably than sexual orientation, with cases such as the Asher's bakery case and the Bull v Hall used as illustration. However, assuming that there must be a hierarchy just because in these cases one side has won or because of the creation of a special exception (Sandberg, 2014) may be to assume too readily that the Courts are creating a hierarchy (Pearson, 2016).…”
Section: Hierarchy Between Groundsmentioning
confidence: 99%