2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2011.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goal emulation and planning in perceptual space using learned affordances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
68
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
68
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of this classification we then provide a comprehensive and qualitative discussion on existing research to identify both promising and potentially futile directions as well as open problems and research questions to be addressed in future (see Section 6). Though existing studies also give similar discussions (Ugur et al, 2011;Horton et al, 2012;Thill et al, 2013;Jamone et al, 2016), our discussion is distinct in being motivated by a quantitative study.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result of this classification we then provide a comprehensive and qualitative discussion on existing research to identify both promising and potentially futile directions as well as open problems and research questions to be addressed in future (see Section 6). Though existing studies also give similar discussions (Ugur et al, 2011;Horton et al, 2012;Thill et al, 2013;Jamone et al, 2016), our discussion is distinct in being motivated by a quantitative study.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…We see this as an unfortunate deficit in the field, as it is presently extremely difficult to quantitatively compare different computational models of affordance to study their competitiveness. Ugur et al (2011) published an early, coarse classification of various applications of the concept of affordance in robotics. In total, their classification considered 16 published works by studying their applied learning schemes and internal representations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the work presented here, Ugur et al [15] learn action-outcome relations and apply these for functional categorization. Object-related sensory data are represented as 43-dimensional vectors, which include object position, visibility and shape.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Object-related contingencies are tightly connected to the notion of object affordances [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] that are defined by the set of actions that can be applied to an object. An object-related eSMC encodes or predicts an outcome of a certain action performed on an object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that an agent would require more of such relations on different objects and behaviours to learn more general affordance relations and to conceptualize over its sensorimotor experiences. During the last decade, similar formalizations of affordances proved to be very practical with successful applications to domains such as navigation [15], manipulation [16,17,18,19,20], conceptualization and language [5,4], planning [18], imitation and emulation [12,18,4], tool use [21,22,13] and vision [4]. A notable one with a notion of affordances similar to ours is presented by Montesano et al [23,24].…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 72%