Goal Attainment Scaling: A Technique for Evaluating Conductive Education

Abstract

Conductive education -how to evaluate it?Is it really impossible for scientists to design the definitive evaluation study? This is a question asked many times by both parents and professionals involved with conductive education. Understandably frustrated by years of controverSy over an approach which was first introduced into this country more than 30 years ago, many looked to the Birmingham project for the answer to the question: is conductive education a good way of educating children with cerebral palsy? Here was a project which had been planned by experts in the field, was funded by the government and was centred on an attempt to transplant conductive education as a complete system into the UK. However, as Bairstow and Cochrane pointed out recently in the BJSE, the teething problems associated with getting the Birmingham Institute running had a knock-on effect on the evaluation itself and the results raised many more questions than they answered. Ideally, of course, the first Birmingham evaluation should have been viewed as a preparation for a second study which would begin after the first set of conductors had been fully trained and new children recruited.Since it is unlikely that a repeat of the Birmingham project will take place, what are the alternatives? In the papers that follow, two quite different approaches are represented. In the first MacKay and colleagues, from the Faculty of Education Sirathclyde University, describe the beginnings of another large project, based at the Scottish Centre for Children with Motor Impairments. In this project, organ transplant has not been considered. Instead, an attempt is being made to produce a Scottish version of conductive education by the process of grafting. As part of the evaluation project the group is experimenting with a measurement technique, Goal Attainment Scaling, which they describe in detail.In the second paper, Sigafoos etal., from the

Performance Evaluation and Accountability for School Psychologists: Challenges and Opportunities

“…GAS validity evidence includes analyses of many types of intervention outcomes, including school-based interventions (see Kratochwill, Elliott, & Busse, 1995). GAS has been found to be responsive to measuring diverse functional goals across services and sensitive to measuring intervention-inducted change, making it a strong outcome measure for groups of students in which the rate of progress varies (MacKay, McCool, Cheseldine, & McCartney, 1993). A summary of the research regarding the utility and acceptability of GAS for measuring students' progress can be found in Roach and Elliott (2005).…”

Paediatric Application of Individualised Client-Centred Outcome Measures: A Literature Review

“…Studies included in this review supported the reliability and validity of GAS as an outcome measure for paediatric populations (Stephens and Haley 1991, Palisano et al 1992, Palisano 1993. Most of the authors in the 34 studies reviewed in this paper combined the use of GAS with other measures, that is, GAS was used as the sole outcome measure in 12 of 34 studies (Wallin and Koch 1977, Maloney et al 1978, Clark and Caudrey 1983, Maher 1983, Bonaguro et al 1984, Cookfair et al 1986, Mackay et al 1993, Young and Chesson 1997, Brown et al 1998, Mitchell and Cusick 1998, Dreiling and Bundy 2003, Cook 2005.…”

Steps to evaluating a statewide internship program: Model, trainee, and student outcomes

“…GAS validity evidence includes analyses of many types of intervention outcomes including school-based interventions (see Kratochwill et al, 1995). GAS has been found to be responsive to measuring diverse functional goals across services and sensitive to measuring intervention-inducted change, making it a strong outcome measure for groups of students in which the rate of progress varies (MacKay, McCool, Cheseldine, & McCartney, 1993). A summary of the research regarding the utility and acceptability of GAS for measuring students' progress can be found in Roach and Elliott (2005).…”