2019
DOI: 10.3390/atmos10110676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GNSS Ionosphere Sounding of Equatorial Plasma Bubbles

Abstract: Ground- and space-based Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers can provide three-dimensional (3D) information about the occurrence of equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs). For this study, we selected March 2014 data (during solar maximum of cycle 24) for the analysis. The timing and the latitudinal dependence of the EPBs occurrence rate are derived by means of the rate of the total electron content (TEC) index (ROTI) data from GNSS receivers in China, whereas vertical profiles of the scintillation ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(24 reference statements)
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This simultaneous E‐ and F‐region irregularity occurrence has also been noted in more recent work by Ma et al. (2019). Watson and Pedatella (2018a) studied the characteristics of the F‐region plasma irregularities at medium scale sizes (∼2–50 km) using COSMIC measurements and observed an increase in the irregularity intensity and occurrence in the 400–440 km altitude range around 20 to 24 magnetic local time (MLT) in solar active years.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This simultaneous E‐ and F‐region irregularity occurrence has also been noted in more recent work by Ma et al. (2019). Watson and Pedatella (2018a) studied the characteristics of the F‐region plasma irregularities at medium scale sizes (∼2–50 km) using COSMIC measurements and observed an increase in the irregularity intensity and occurrence in the 400–440 km altitude range around 20 to 24 magnetic local time (MLT) in solar active years.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In an integrated study of concurrent E-and F-region irregularities using a ground-based GNSS receiver and Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) RO measurements, Yang and Liu (2018) showed that while the F-region irregularities occur mainly during 20-03 LT, observed irregularities at higher altitudes were more pronounced during 20-22 LT. Those authors reported the coexistence of sporadic E and EPBs in the F region during post-sunset hours. This simultaneous E-and F-region irregularity occurrence has also been noted in more recent work by Ma et al (2019). Watson and Pedatella (2018a) studied the characteristics of the F-region plasma irregularities at medium scale sizes (∼2-50 km) using COSMIC measurements and observed an increase in the irregularity intensity and occurrence in the 400-440 km altitude range around 20 to 24 magnetic local time (MLT) in solar active years.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As one of the causes of radio signal scintillation, regions of ionospheric irregularities in the F-layer, known as Equatorial Plasma Bubbles (EPB), have been investigated with RO measurements, adding a limb-sounding perspective to ground-based measurements. During March 2014 (around the equinox and at the maximum of the 24th solar cycle), COSMIC data corroborated ground-based measurements and showed a higher occurrence of EPBs at the magnetic equator after sunset, at about 450 km and descending to 300 km around midnight [23]. A longer period of evaluation, between 2007 and 2017, showed a similar interval of occurrence of EPBs with peak varying depending on the level of solar activity.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It sets a priori information for each voxel before the iteration begins in the tomographic region. The kth iteration of ART algorithm computes the difference between Y and Y k which is obtain by using the current estimated value X k in Eq (4) [35][36][37]. A correction derived from the difference is distributed over X k to get X k+1 .…”
Section: Classic Methods and Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%