2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-022-01345-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GNSS antispoofing method using the intersection angle between two directions of arrival (IA-DOA) for multiantenna receivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 7 shows the difference between the clock biases t O and t A used in the security check (12), computed respectively in the legitimate and under-attack case. Indeed, the check cannot distinguish the legitimate from the under-attack scenario, since the actual differences between legitimate and fake are well below the standard deviation of the metric itself.…”
Section: B Attacks In Ideal Scenario Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 7 shows the difference between the clock biases t O and t A used in the security check (12), computed respectively in the legitimate and under-attack case. Indeed, the check cannot distinguish the legitimate from the under-attack scenario, since the actual differences between legitimate and fake are well below the standard deviation of the metric itself.…”
Section: B Attacks In Ideal Scenario Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relevant example is signal quality monitoring (SQM), where the user monitors a set of metrics evaluating the quality of the correlation peaks [10], or the received signal strength, and checks that the received signal power or the carrier-to-noise-ratio matches a predefined statistic [11]. Alternatively, a receiver may use an inertial measurement unit (IMU) [13] to confirm the acceleration and movement direction, or antenna arrays to detect the angle-of-arrival of the received GNSS signals and reject signals coming from anomalous directions [12]. Other techniques involve consistency check with the position, velocity, and time (PVT) solution obtained from a cellular network [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, due to the geometric and kinematic differences between the GNSS satellite and the spoofer, the spoofing will disrupt consistency, so multi-agent spoofing can be detected. Chen et al [ 13 ] used the position information of multiple antennas to derive the intersection angle between two directions of arrival (IA-DOA) of different signals. Based on the predicted and estimated values of IA-DOA, generalized likelihood ratio testing (GLRT) was performed to achieve multi-direction spoofing detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A spoofing detection method using the intersection angle between two directions of arrival (IA-DOA) is proposed. The IA-DOA method is proved to be insensitive to the platform attitude, which reduces the cost and complexity of the experiment, but this method cannot obtain the direction information about the spoofer in the airspace [21]. The multi-antenna DOA spoofing detection method is mainly based on the difference between the real signal and the spoofing signal and performs spoofing detection according to the different information of DOAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%