2020
DOI: 10.1002/edm2.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucose variability and mood in adults with diabetes: A systematic review

Abstract: Aims To systematically review the literature regarding the association between glucose variability (GV) and mood in adults with diabetes, appraise the used methods and make suggestions for future research. Methods A systematic review of literature published up to May 2019 was performed. Abstracts and full texts were screened independently in duplicate. Experimental and observational studies reporting the association between GV and mood in adults with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes were evaluated. A descrip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, empirical data on these complex relationships within the stream of day-to-day life are limited, as research, to date, has primarily relied on (1) hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ) as a measure of blood glucose, which does not capture short-term blood glucose levels and variability [ 10 ] and (2) global, retrospective reports of mood, function, and well-being, which do not afford the ability to examine short-term dynamics in subjective experiences and functioning and are often biased by current states and recall problems. A recent review notes a lack of definitive empirical evidence, calling for more rigorous methodology to investigate relationships between glucose variability and mood [ 11 ]. This study addresses the call for increased rigor by employing blinded continuous glucose monitoring, accelerometry, ambulatory cognitive tasks, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to uncover dynamic associations among blood glucose levels, function, and emotion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, empirical data on these complex relationships within the stream of day-to-day life are limited, as research, to date, has primarily relied on (1) hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ) as a measure of blood glucose, which does not capture short-term blood glucose levels and variability [ 10 ] and (2) global, retrospective reports of mood, function, and well-being, which do not afford the ability to examine short-term dynamics in subjective experiences and functioning and are often biased by current states and recall problems. A recent review notes a lack of definitive empirical evidence, calling for more rigorous methodology to investigate relationships between glucose variability and mood [ 11 ]. This study addresses the call for increased rigor by employing blinded continuous glucose monitoring, accelerometry, ambulatory cognitive tasks, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to uncover dynamic associations among blood glucose levels, function, and emotion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the specific association between psychological disturbances and glycaemic variability has not received much attention. Some studies have examined the correlation between mood and short-term glycaemic variability in Type 1 diabetes, some of them evaluating different continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics, but study samples have been small and results were inconsistent [ 33 ]. To our knowledge, the present report represents the first approach to specifically investigate on the relationship between psychological factors and long-term glycaemic variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glycemic variability (GV) is a measure of the amplitude, frequency, and duration of glycemic fluctuations around mean BG; encompasses both diurnal hyperglycemic peaks and hypoglycemic troughs; and has become a reliable marker of glycemic control (27). To date, the two most frequently used indicators of GV are coefficient of variation and standard deviation of BG measurements (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%