2014
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucose control in intensive care: usability, efficacy and safety of Space GlucoseControl in two medical European intensive care units

Abstract: BackgroundThe Space GlucoseControl system (SGC) is a nurse-driven, computer-assisted device for glycemic control combining infusion pumps with the enhanced Model Predictive Control algorithm (B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany). We aimed to investigate the performance of the SGC in medical critically ill patients.MethodsTwo open clinical investigations in tertiary centers in Graz, Austria and Zurich, Switzerland were performed. Efficacy was assessed by percentage of time within the target range (4.4-8.3 mmol/L; prim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Výsledkem bylo více uvolněné doporučení udržovat glykémii na hladinách mezi 8 až 10 mmol/l (144 mg/dL -180 mg/dL). Celá řada dalších prací přinesla navzájem kontroverzní výsledky (101)(102)(103)(104)(105). Jedna skupina doporučuje co nejnižší, ale zároveň ještě bezpečné glykémie, druhá se nebrání i hodnotám kolem 10 -12mmol/l (97).…”
Section: Hyperglykémie U Kriticky Nemocných a Její Terapeutické Ovlivunclassified
“…Výsledkem bylo více uvolněné doporučení udržovat glykémii na hladinách mezi 8 až 10 mmol/l (144 mg/dL -180 mg/dL). Celá řada dalších prací přinesla navzájem kontroverzní výsledky (101)(102)(103)(104)(105). Jedna skupina doporučuje co nejnižší, ale zároveň ještě bezpečné glykémie, druhá se nebrání i hodnotám kolem 10 -12mmol/l (97).…”
Section: Hyperglykémie U Kriticky Nemocných a Její Terapeutické Ovlivunclassified
“…1 Micro-dialysis has often been used in the clinical environment for continuously harvesting body fluids in a minimal invasive manner, but a drawback of this process are variable recovery rates. 2,3 Some general considerations in microdialysis have been reviewed also by Nandi and Lunte.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They tend to dismiss expert system controllers as they are not mathematically derived, but rather rely on heuristic reasoning. This study shows that when an AI-based controller is carefully designed by a domain expert 8 who also has decades of clinical experience, that it may have the potential to improve on the results achieved by either PID or MPC controllers, 45,46 although strictly speaking it is not valid to compare in silico results with clinical studies. Specifically, this simulation shows that this AI-based controller may be capable of achieving exceptional results, including (1) time in control range > 90%, (2) time in range 70-140 mg/dl > 95%, (3) severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dl) rate of 0, (4) hypoglycemia (40-69 mg/dl) rate < 0.1%, (5) CV < 13%, and (6) hyperglycemia (>140 mg/dl) rate < 3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%