2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.endinu.2018.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucemia basal en el primer trimestre como acercamiento inicial al diagnóstico de la diabetes en el embarazo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach differed from that in observational studies that compared women with eGDM and GDM [9]. Very often, the latter (i.e., women with GDM) had only been screened in the second half of their pregnancy, which is problematic for two reasons: first, some of them would have already screened positive for eGDM had they been screened earlier [10][11][12][13][14] and therefore they would have been classified as eGDM using our methodology, and second, early screening in these studies is usually performed only in women with risk factors for type 2 diabetes/HIP. As risk factors, and especially obesity [39], are intrinsically associated with a poor prognosis (irrespective of HIP or not) [16], these studies suffered from inclusion bias, with a higher risk at inclusion in women with eGDM than in those with GDM.…”
Section: Study Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach differed from that in observational studies that compared women with eGDM and GDM [9]. Very often, the latter (i.e., women with GDM) had only been screened in the second half of their pregnancy, which is problematic for two reasons: first, some of them would have already screened positive for eGDM had they been screened earlier [10][11][12][13][14] and therefore they would have been classified as eGDM using our methodology, and second, early screening in these studies is usually performed only in women with risk factors for type 2 diabetes/HIP. As risk factors, and especially obesity [39], are intrinsically associated with a poor prognosis (irrespective of HIP or not) [16], these studies suffered from inclusion bias, with a higher risk at inclusion in women with eGDM than in those with GDM.…”
Section: Study Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This initial recommendation [3,4] was, however, reconsidered by both organisations for two main reasons [6]: first, although treating GDM after 24 weeks of gestation (WG) reduces adverse events during pregnancy [7,8], the same has not been demonstrated for early-diagnosed GDM (eGDM) [6,9]. Second, at least half of untreated women with early fasting hyperglycaemia do not develop GDM later in pregnancy [10][11][12][13][14]. Currently, no data exist in the literature on the persistence of DIP throughout pregnancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La embarazada normalmente presenta glucemias de ayuno durante el primer trimestre menores a 85 mg/dl, por lo cual valores por encima de este nivel en este período del embarazo son uno de los factores de riesgo asociados al desarrollo de DG 3,8,15,[17][18][19] . Los cambios en el estilo de vida son fundamentales para prevenir esta enfermedad 4,5,9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Mientras que la PTOG está dirigida a detectar a las gestantes con intolerancia postprandial a los hidratos de carbono. 167 La FIGO y la OMS, consideran que a todas las gestantes con resultado de glicemia normal en el primer trimestre debe realizarse la PTOG a partir de las 24 semanas. 2,20 En las gestantes incluidas en este estudio la PTOG se realizó solo en 75 (14,6%) de 511 gestantes que debieron realizarse la prueba.…”
Section: Patrones Nutricionales Y Asociación De Variables Sociodemogr...unclassified