2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2986171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glottal Source Information for Pathological Voice Detection

Abstract: Automatic methods for the detection of pathological voice from healthy speech can be considered as potential clinical tools for medical treatment. This study investigates the effectiveness of glottal source information in the detection of pathological voice by comparing the classical pipeline approach to the end-to-end approach. The traditional pipeline approach consists of a feature extractor and a separate classifier. In the former, two sets of glottal features (computed using the quasi-closed phase glottal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Features used Classifier Database Best accuracy(%) [10] Autocorrelation and entropy SVM MEEI, SVD and AVPD 99.69, 92.79 and 99.79 [21] Glottal flow parameters SVM MEEI and SVD 99.27 and 93.66 [19] MFCC DBSCAN-SVM MEEI 98.63 [8] Jitter, Shimmer, HNR, TNI and NFHE KNN MEEI 96.1 [11] PPE SVM Private 91.4 [12] Largest Lyapunov exponent SVM MEEI 88.89 [22] openSMILE features and Glottal parameters SVM and CNN UA-speech and TORGO 87.93 and 76.66 [16] MFCC SVM SVD 86 [20] MFCC-QCP and Glottal source features SVM HUPA and SVD 78.37 [17] MLSF GMM MEEI 77.9 [9] HNR, NNE and GNE KNN UAM 66.57 which can represent the influence of voice diseases on the mechanism of the vocal folds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Features used Classifier Database Best accuracy(%) [10] Autocorrelation and entropy SVM MEEI, SVD and AVPD 99.69, 92.79 and 99.79 [21] Glottal flow parameters SVM MEEI and SVD 99.27 and 93.66 [19] MFCC DBSCAN-SVM MEEI 98.63 [8] Jitter, Shimmer, HNR, TNI and NFHE KNN MEEI 96.1 [11] PPE SVM Private 91.4 [12] Largest Lyapunov exponent SVM MEEI 88.89 [22] openSMILE features and Glottal parameters SVM and CNN UA-speech and TORGO 87.93 and 76.66 [16] MFCC SVM SVD 86 [20] MFCC-QCP and Glottal source features SVM HUPA and SVD 78.37 [17] MLSF GMM MEEI 77.9 [9] HNR, NNE and GNE KNN UAM 66.57 which can represent the influence of voice diseases on the mechanism of the vocal folds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the glottal flow waveform may have more potential for the detection and classification of pathological voices. For studies of glottal flow waveform, most previous works only evaluated the contribution of classical 12 glottal source parameters to voice pathology detection [20] [21] [22]. However, in this work, not only were classical glottal source parameters evaluated, but also the effects of acoustic features directly extracted from glottal source signals on pathological voice detection were explored.…”
Section: A Estimation Of Glottal Flow Waveformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the model, the LSTM-based AE network extract ECG signal features, and the SVM classifier is applied for classifying different ECG arrhythmias signals [13].The result shows the proposed method has more than 99% accuracy. The author of [14] proposed a methods for the detection of pathological voice from healthy speech based on glottal source information. Two combination method are used, including a combination of convolutional neural network (CNN) and multilayer perceptron (MLP), and a combination of CNN and LSTM network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the proposed method achieves more than 99% accuracy. The author of [ 14 ] proposed methods for detecting pathological voices from among healthy speech data, using glottal source information. Here, two combination of methods were used: a combination of a convolutional neural network (CNN) and multilayer perceptron, and a combination of a CNN and LSTM networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%