2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globalization, conflict discourse, and Jewish identity in an Israeli Russian-speaking online community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the absence of support from Russia, the Russian Diaspora is rapidly assimilating linguistically with the local population, which by no means strengthens the position of the Russian language. The only exception is the situation in Israel, since about 30% of the population of this country is Russian-speaking (Perelmutter, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the absence of support from Russia, the Russian Diaspora is rapidly assimilating linguistically with the local population, which by no means strengthens the position of the Russian language. The only exception is the situation in Israel, since about 30% of the population of this country is Russian-speaking (Perelmutter, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the advent of the internet has made possible interactions across time and space, posing new challenges for the study of (im)politeness and demanding more attention to the online contexts. Extant research has generally examined impoliteness either in offline interaction ( Bousfield, 2008 ; Culpeper, 1996 , 2011 ) or online interaction ( Blitvich, 2018 ; Fedriani, 2019 ; Locher, 2011 ; Parvaresh and Tayebi, 2018 ; Perelmutter, 2018 ; Vladimirou and House, 2018 ). The interplay between these two interactional contexts and participants’ situated judgment of (im)politeness has not received much attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, impoliteness is also situated in interactional contexts. Although impoliteness studies have examined both face-to-face or offline interaction ( Bousfield, 2008 ; Culpeper, 1996 , 2011 ) and online interaction ( Blitvich, 2018 ; Fedriani, 2019 ; Locher, 2011 ; Parvaresh and Tayebi, 2018 ; Perelmutter, 2018 ; Vladimirou and House, 2018 ), the interplay between these two interactional contexts and participants’ situated judgment of impoliteness acts in the two interactional contexts is rarely discussed in literature. The online interaction is not completely isolated from or independent of offline interaction, in that the online interaction can sometimes be evoked by impoliteness in offline interaction and it is a continuum of the discussion and debate in offline interaction.…”
Section: Situated Impolitenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for what is happening, in our opinion, lies in the need for productive human interaction within the framework of the confession of universal values. Even very critical people will not deny "people's craving for a normal life, based on the rules developed by mankind for several millennia of its existence" (Anfinogentova, 1993, p. 3), reached the modern generation through the Bible, the Quran or the Torah (Baltabayeva, 2016;Perelmutter, 2018;Ben-Menachem & Livnat, 2018;Balashova, 2016).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%