“…Standard‐based EMS have attracted attention from policy makers for their potential to complement “command‐and‐control” regulations in fostering environmental protection (Daddi, Testa, Iraldo, & Frey, ) and as a research field for academics in management and organizational studies (Testa, Heras‐Saizarbitoria, Daddi, Boiral, & Iraldo, ). As for the latter, management scholars have mostly focused on the socio‐ecological, technical, and economic aspects of EMS adoption and diffusion (Salim et al, ). Noteworthy studies on EMS have investigated the motivations and drivers of EMS adoption (Delmas & Toffel, ; Heras‐Saizarbitoria, Arana, & Boiral, ; King, Lenox, & Terlaak, ), the relation between EMS adoption and environmental performance (Daddi, Iraldo, Testa, & De Giacomo, ; Daddi, Magistrelli, Frey, & Iraldo, ; Iraldo, Testa, & Frey, ; Russo, ;) or competitive performance (Darnall & Edwards, ; Darnall, Henriques, & Sadorsky, ; Hojnik & Ruzzier, ), substantive EMS internalization and symbolic adoption (Boiral, ; Castka & Prajogo, ; Christmann & Taylor, ; Testa, Boiral, & Iraldo, ; Yin & Schmeidler, ), and EMS certification diffusion and abandonment (Daddi, De Giacomo, Frey, & Iraldo, ; Merli & Preziosi, ; Preziosi, Merli, & D'Amico, ).…”