2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1090-9516(00)00029-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global standardization as a success formula for marketing in Central Eastern Europe?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, empirical research suggests that foreign investors typically position their products at the upper end of the market, leaving the lower end to local brands, in anticipation of market growth with the emergence of the middle class (Schuh 2000). Many of the first entrants were global-oriented companies that create products pro-actively and adapt them passively, pursuing highly standardized marketing strategies in CEE with limited adaptation e.g.…”
Section: Marketing Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, empirical research suggests that foreign investors typically position their products at the upper end of the market, leaving the lower end to local brands, in anticipation of market growth with the emergence of the middle class (Schuh 2000). Many of the first entrants were global-oriented companies that create products pro-actively and adapt them passively, pursuing highly standardized marketing strategies in CEE with limited adaptation e.g.…”
Section: Marketing Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other major brands access the market through importation and, consequently, local representatives have no direct understanding of branding decisions/activities, so are not included in these investigations. Interview structure was based upon a number of existing frameworks pertinent to both the nature of, and factors determining, suppliers' adaptation/standardization decisions (Jain, 1989;Kotler, 1986;Luna and Gupta, 2001;Melewar and Vemmervik, 2004;Ozsomer and Simonin, 2004;Schuh, 2000;Siraliova and Angelis, 2006;Viswanathan and Dickson, 2007;Zou and Cavusgil, 2002) and these were tailored to meet the needs of the study. Although relevant frameworks are normally adopted for surveys the relatively small size demanded a more personalized/content-rich approach and it was determined that structured interviews would serve this purpose best -see Appendices 1 (nature) and 2 (determining factors) for interview schedules.…”
Section: Phase 1 -Qualitative Study 431 Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…direct entry) may not always be possible (Jain, 1989). Indirect approaches (e.g., local agency) have, by contrast, proved effective in politically ambiguous/developing markets (Schuh 2000), and though this may constrain strategic choice (Griffith, Chandra and Ryans, 2002) the benefits of exploiting local expertise can be great, especially for ultracompetitive categories such as electrical appliances. Competition, of course, impacts strategy generally (Whitelock and Jobber, 2000), not least when associated with standardization/adaptation decisions (Viswanathan and Dickson, 2007).…”
Section: Proposition P1bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…environmental development, macro-and micro-environment and stakeholders) have to be considered when deciding whether to standardise or adapt a marketing mix. Followed by extensive studies in the subsequent years [37][38][39][40], it is now recognised that several factors influence marketing mix Standardization, particularly amongst SMEs operating in B2B markets [41]. As such, these influencing factors have to be integrated to get an optimal marketing mix [42,43].…”
Section: The Adaptation/standardization Debatementioning
confidence: 99%