2019
DOI: 10.1177/0020702019894991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global order, US–China relations, and Chinese behaviour: The ground is shifting, Canada must adjust

Abstract: Three profound shifts are coming to a head in the twenty-first century: shifts in the global order, shifts in the US–China relationship, and shifts in Chinese behaviour. These shifts are compelling Canada to reframe its relations with China. First, at the global level, the changing balance of power is leading us toward an era of polycentric global governance. Second, there is deepening antagonism in US–China relations. Third, China’s international posture has become more assertive. Canada has yet to adjust, bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the game theory payoff matrix also demonstrate that cooperation offers the best combination of benefits for both players, but in the event that the US side deliberately chooses conflict, the best course of action for China's interests is to embrace a comparable level of confrontation (Bell & Quek, 2018;Lee, 2012;Lu et al, 2020). China should be prepared to formulate a long-term plan to counter confrontation with the US at the same level and expedite the appropriate layout as the confrontation between the US and China becomes more common in the post-epidemic age (Huang & Wang, 2021;Lu et al, 2020;Massot, 2019).…”
Section: Significant Objective Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the game theory payoff matrix also demonstrate that cooperation offers the best combination of benefits for both players, but in the event that the US side deliberately chooses conflict, the best course of action for China's interests is to embrace a comparable level of confrontation (Bell & Quek, 2018;Lee, 2012;Lu et al, 2020). China should be prepared to formulate a long-term plan to counter confrontation with the US at the same level and expedite the appropriate layout as the confrontation between the US and China becomes more common in the post-epidemic age (Huang & Wang, 2021;Lu et al, 2020;Massot, 2019).…”
Section: Significant Objective Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%