“…The highest priority was given to data in peer-reviewed scientific articles that synthesize, evaluate, and reconcile long-term information sourced from various datasets with global coverage, such as inventories for organochlorine pesticides, 3,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] PCBs, 2, 14 PBDEs, 32 HBCDD, 33 PFOS, 34 PFOA, 35 and SCCPs. 4 This is because these inventories are considered to meet the gold standards for quality assurance and quality control in the chemical inventory development: they are transparent (with full documentation of methodologies, data, procedures, results, and associated uncertainties), complete (with comprehensive coverage of emission sources throughout the life cycle), consistent (that is, not a patchwork of national or regional estimates derived using different methodologies), accurate (with thorough evaluation or verification against environmental monitoring data), and with spatial and temporal resolutions. When data were not available from these studies, we took information from the International Programme on Chemical Safety's Environmental Health Criteria monograph series, the International Agency for Research on Cancer's Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans monograph series, the chemical background documents prepared for the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (the OSPAR Convention), and the chemical risk profile documents prepared for the Stockholm Convention's POPs Review Committee.…”