2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.894372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Distribution of Zooplankton Biomass Estimated by In Situ Imaging and Machine Learning

Abstract: Zooplankton plays a major role in ocean food webs and biogeochemical cycles, and provides major ecosystem services as a main driver of the biological carbon pump and in sustaining fish communities. Zooplankton is also sensitive to its environment and reacts to its changes. To better understand the importance of zooplankton, and to inform prognostic models that try to represent them, spatially-resolved biomass estimates of key plankton taxa are desirable. In this study we predict, for the first time, the global… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, other groups were merged because they exhibited similar patterns in preliminary analysis (e.g., Copepoda and Copepoda‐like), for a final list of 28 taxa (Figure 1). Finally, the same operator reviewed a random subsample of images from each final taxonomic group, with error rates at <10% for all groups and <2.5% for most (Drago et al, 2022). Although a normalized biomass size spectrum revealed an underestimation in the 600 μm–1 mm size range, 80% of organisms in our dataset were over 1 mm in ESD, therefore accurately detected by UVP5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then, other groups were merged because they exhibited similar patterns in preliminary analysis (e.g., Copepoda and Copepoda‐like), for a final list of 28 taxa (Figure 1). Finally, the same operator reviewed a random subsample of images from each final taxonomic group, with error rates at <10% for all groups and <2.5% for most (Drago et al, 2022). Although a normalized biomass size spectrum revealed an underestimation in the 600 μm–1 mm size range, 80% of organisms in our dataset were over 1 mm in ESD, therefore accurately detected by UVP5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New in situ cameras now image planktonic organisms in their natural environment and resolve their fine‐scale vertical distribution (Stemmann et al, 2008), while generating large datasets (Kiko et al, 2022), homogenized by reviewing images (Irisson et al, 2022). These tools also allow studying fragile taxonomic groups such as Rhizaria, whose contribution to global planktonic biomass was underestimated (Biard et al, 2016; Dennett et al, 2002; Drago et al, 2022). These approaches lack in taxonomic identification fineness, but compensate with identifications and data quantity consistency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Today, in situ imaging allows quantification and distinction at low taxonomic level of large Rhizaria as well as measurement of their biovolume (Nakamura et al 2017; Biard and Ohman 2020). Following our measurements of elemental composition on individual Rhizaria, it is very likely that previous global C biomass assessments based on in situ imaging (Biard et al 2016; Drago et al 2022) need to be revised. Indeed, all giant Phaeodaria (> 600 μ m) sampled by this method have a C density much lower (ranging from 0.6 ± 0.2 μ g C mm −3 for Aulosphaeridae to 52.9 ± 13.1 μ g C mm −3 for Castanellidae; Table 1) than the conversion factor used previously (80 μ g C mm −3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sea surface temperature (SST) rise, one of the consequences of climate change, will continue to intensify under all CO 2 emission scenarios (Kwiatkowski et al 2020). When considering climate change effects on marine ecosystem functioning copepods are a key focus group due to their high abundance (Drago et al 2022), their nutritional value for higher trophic levels (Brett et al, 2009) and their role in biogeochemical cycling (Steinberg and Landry 2017). They represent between 70-90% of the mesozooplankton in pelagic ecosystems (Turner 2004) and are amongst the most abundant taxa of the meiofauna in benthic ecosystems together with nematodes (Giere 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%