2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Approach for Simulated Moving Bed Model Identification: Design of Experiments, Uncertainty Evaluation, and Optimization Strategy Assessment

Abstract: Simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography is a widely used technique for the resolution of compounds difficult to separate. SMB parameter estimation is traditionally carried out following a time and money consuming series of experiments in an SMB unit where deviations may arise. This work aims to present a novel global and straightforward parameter estimation procedure together with uncertainty analysis. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is employed to search for parameters in an eight-dimensional space, avoid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned, previous studies considered a pseudo-homogeneous reaction that simplifies the model. In addition, SMBR modeling bears a high computational burden that can be prevented by substituting it by the TMBR model, which is simpler to be carried out and it is equivalent to SMBR by keeping constant the liquid velocity relative to the solid velocity in the model [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, previous studies considered a pseudo-homogeneous reaction that simplifies the model. In addition, SMBR modeling bears a high computational burden that can be prevented by substituting it by the TMBR model, which is simpler to be carried out and it is equivalent to SMBR by keeping constant the liquid velocity relative to the solid velocity in the model [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, two routes can be taken, experimental estimation or calculation through correlations. The referred work took the second route, making use of the Wilson and Geankoplis equation, [ 14,18,19 ] depicted as: Shp=1.09normalε()RepSc0.33for0.0015<Rep<55 where Shp, Rep, and Sc are, respectively, the Sherwood, Reynolds, and Schmidt numbers, which, in their turn, are computed by: Shp=kL,idnormalpDi,mix Rep=ρudnormalpη Sc=ηρDi,mix where ρ is the fluid density, η is the fluid viscosity, dnormalp is the particle diameter, and Di,mix is the diffusivity coefficient of the compound i in the mixture. The diffusivity coefficient can be calculated by the correlation of Perkins and Geankoplis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, two routes can be taken, experimental estimation or calculation through correlations. The referred work took the second route, making use of the Wilson and Geankoplis equation, [14,18,19] depicted as:…”
Section: Fully Mechanistic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vacancies are filled with the region shape information by employing a method based on the Multivariate Law of Propagation of Probability Density Functions (MLPP), using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, which requires less computational effort than re-evaluating the objective function. 21 To fill the coverage region in M1, a normal Gaussian with zero mean (μ = 0) and standard deviation equal to one (s = 1) is considered with points within the limits of the ellipse (coverage probability octave equals 99.9%, equivalent to x within −3.291 and 3.291). New points are created as given by (…”
Section: Uncertainty Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%