2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19204419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GLMB Tracker with Partial Smoothing

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce a tracking algorithm based on labeled Random Finite Sets (RFS) and Rauch–Tung–Striebel (RTS) smoother via a Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli (GLMB) multi-scan estimator to track multiple objects in a wide range of tracking scenarios. In the forward filtering stage, we use the GLMB filter to generate a set of labels and the association history between labels and the measurements. In the trajectory-estimating stage, we apply a track management strategy to eliminate tracks with shor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the average sense, the response of the δ-GLMB smoother to target birth is faster than that of the CPHD smoother, whereas its response to target death is slightly quicker than that of the CPHD smoother. The prompt response of the δ-GLMB smoother attributes mainly to the fast response of the δ-GLMB filter [34] to target birth or death because the smoothing density relies on both the filtering density and the measurements indicating the true target number. The PHD and MB smoothers suffer from the premature target death [23], [25] at 40s, 45s, which are also seen by the large OSPA cardinality errors at those moments in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the average sense, the response of the δ-GLMB smoother to target birth is faster than that of the CPHD smoother, whereas its response to target death is slightly quicker than that of the CPHD smoother. The prompt response of the δ-GLMB smoother attributes mainly to the fast response of the δ-GLMB filter [34] to target birth or death because the smoothing density relies on both the filtering density and the measurements indicating the true target number. The PHD and MB smoothers suffer from the premature target death [23], [25] at 40s, 45s, which are also seen by the large OSPA cardinality errors at those moments in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the subtraction sign in B + − B + denotes the set difference operation, and r ( ) B denotes the birth probability of label ∈ B + . Replacing ω (33) by (34) leads to ω (I ,ξ,B + ,S…”
Section: B Ranked Assignment Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the mode or mean. Alternatively, the entire trajectory of object`2 I ⇤ can be estimated using the forward-backward algorithm, starting from its current filtering density p (⇠ ⇤ ) (•,`) and propagating backward to its time of birth [20], [54].…”
Section: Multi-sensor Glmb Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This filter can estimate not only the number of the targets but also their trajectories, simultaneously [12]. It has been applied to several problems as tracking with merged measurements [13], track-before-detect [14,15], extended targets [16], cell biology [17,18], sensor scheduling [19], spawning targets [20], distributed data fusion [21], field robotics [22,23] and computer vision [24]. The GLMB filter for multitarget tracking with two sensors has been developed in [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%