2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2971624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multitarget Tracking Using One Time Step Lagged Delta-Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli Smoothing

Abstract: Aiming at improving the tracking performance of the delta-generalized labeled multi-Bernoulli (δ-GLMB) filter, we present a one time step lagged δ-GLMB smoother in this work, which also inherently outputs targets trajectories and differs from the Probability hypothesis density (PHD), Multi-Bernoulli (MB), and Cardinalized probability hypothesis density (CPHD) smoothers that are incapable of generating target trajectories directly. Under the standard multitarget measurement likelihood and state transition kerne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On this basis, this paper compared the proposed method with the OL-δ-GLMB smoother (One Time Step Lagged δ-GLMB Smoother [14]) and the FB-LMB smoother (Forward Backward LMB [17]). The authors of [14] provided a detailed comparison of the proposed OL-δ-GLMB smoother, LMB smoother [16], δ-GLMB-A smoother [27] smoother, and δ-GLMB filter [28] and verified its great performance.…”
Section: Multi-target Scene Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On this basis, this paper compared the proposed method with the OL-δ-GLMB smoother (One Time Step Lagged δ-GLMB Smoother [14]) and the FB-LMB smoother (Forward Backward LMB [17]). The authors of [14] provided a detailed comparison of the proposed OL-δ-GLMB smoother, LMB smoother [16], δ-GLMB-A smoother [27] smoother, and δ-GLMB filter [28] and verified its great performance.…”
Section: Multi-target Scene Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the original method, the accuracy of target cardinality and state estimations was improved to a certain extent, and the processing efficiency of the algorithm was further improved due to the reduction of the track pruning threshold. Finally, this paper compares the proposed method with the forward-backward LMB smoother [17] and the One Time Step Lagged δ-GLMB smoother [14] under the same experimental conditions to verify that the proposed method has better tracking performance than existing methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the proposed forward-backward smoother does not specify the form of the multi-object filtering densities. This is in contrast to multi-object forward-backward smoothers based on labelled RFSs [53]- [55], which cannot incorporate the Poisson birth model and require that the multi-object filtering densities must be labelled. The outcome of this work is a method for efficiently sampling multi-object trajectories from the posterior distribution of sets of trajectories, based on operations involving only the single time step multiobject state distributions constructed during forward filtering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generalized labeled multi-Bernoulli (GLMB) filter [ 14 , 15 ] leads to an analytic solution to the Bayes multitarget tracker, which significantly improves the accuracy of multitarget state extraction and explicitly accommodates the estimation of target trajectories. Recently, labeled RFS-based filters and smoothers [ 10 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ] have been further developed, for generating track estimates, which is also the focus of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trajectory Poisson multi-Bernoulli filter and the trajectory Poisson multi-Bernoulli mixture filter [ 18 ] have better filtering accuracy and real-time performance than those of the Gibbs-GLMB filter. A onetime step lagged Bayes multitarget smoother using the density [ 19 ], which also inherently outputs targets trajectories, outperforms the Gibbs-GLMB filter on both the estimates and target number and state at the cost of higher computational complexity. However, when targets are in a dense clutter, or misdetected, generating the correct multitarget trajectories is difficult in [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], although the computational complexity problem has been improved in [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%