2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Component (“Patient Does Not Follow Commands”) Performs Similarly to Total Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting Severe Injury in Trauma Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of motor score alone has been shown to be as accurate as the summed GCS in traumatic brain injury. 4 In our present model, we propose the 'Maritzburg score'; by using only two simple clinical variables: the presence of visible brain matter and a motor score less than 5 allows accurate identification of nonsurvivors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of motor score alone has been shown to be as accurate as the summed GCS in traumatic brain injury. 4 In our present model, we propose the 'Maritzburg score'; by using only two simple clinical variables: the presence of visible brain matter and a motor score less than 5 allows accurate identification of nonsurvivors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature suggested that the motor component of GCS performs as well as the summed GCS in predicting mortality of patients with traumatic brain injury. 4 Furthermore, eye opening and verbal response may be difficult to assess accurately in the resuscitation room, where patients are often intoxicated and may have other confounding factors, such as facial swelling. In light of this, we designed our current study to propose a more simplified clinical score that would allow early prediction of mortality in patients with isolated cerebral gunshot wounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with the conclusions of Rubenson Wahlin (2016); in their study, patients' level of consciousness was assessed in less than 40% of the cases. The importance of the assessment is to avoid undertriaging a patient with potentially serious injuries or overtriaging, which would strain trauma resources (Kupas, Melnychuk, & Young, 2016). The proportion of participants applying a cervical collar increased in both groups, from the first to the last simulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Уровень сознания регистрировали по 3-м шкалам: Глазго, Four, Giocino [3][4][5][6][7][8]. За достоверную положительную клиническую динамику принимали переход пациента по шкале Giocino (2002) на один и более уровень в градации сознания (вегетативное состояние; состояние минимального сознания; минимальное сознание «+»; норма сознания).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…The level of consciousness was assessed using 3 scales: Glasgow, Four, Giocino [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Changes in patient's level of consciousness by one or more level according to the Giocino scale (2002) (vegetative state; a state of minimal consciousness; minimal consciousness «+»; normal consciousness) were taken as significant positive dynamics.…”
Section: результаты и обсуждениеmentioning
confidence: 99%