2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2016.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glacial meltwater influences on plankton community structure and the importance of top-down control (of primary production) in a NE Greenland fjord

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6) most likely reflect organic matter fluxes originating from the phytoplankton bloom that extends from outside the fjord and past the entrance sill (as seen by the fluorescence measurements, Figs. 3, 4), likely influenced by the vertical mixing across the shallow sill (Arendt et al 2016). Interestingly, the two lowest values measured in this zone are for YST1 and YST6, which both lie at a depth of about 60 m, where carbon oxidation is expected to exceed burial (Thamdrup et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) most likely reflect organic matter fluxes originating from the phytoplankton bloom that extends from outside the fjord and past the entrance sill (as seen by the fluorescence measurements, Figs. 3, 4), likely influenced by the vertical mixing across the shallow sill (Arendt et al 2016). Interestingly, the two lowest values measured in this zone are for YST1 and YST6, which both lie at a depth of about 60 m, where carbon oxidation is expected to exceed burial (Thamdrup et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the silty glacial runoff drastically reduces the euphotic depth. The effects of the glacial runoff on the distribution of micro‐ and mesozooplankton (Arendt et al ; Middelbo et al ), marine ecosystem productivity (Meire et al ), colored DOM absorption (Murray et al ), and the carbon availability for bacteria (Paulsen et al ) have previously been described for Young Sound. Small phytoplankton (< 2 μ m) dominate the murky inner fjord and contribute on average 89% of chlorophyll a (Chl a ) compared to 59% at the mouth of the fjord.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small phytoplankton (< 2 μ m) dominate the murky inner fjord and contribute on average 89% of chlorophyll a (Chl a ) compared to 59% at the mouth of the fjord. At the same time, copepod grazing is considerably less in the inner fjord (Middelbo et al ), while protist grazing is enhanced (Arendt et al ). Copepods and protists generally dominate the grazer biomass in Young Sound, although the pelagic gastropod Limacina helicina is abundant particularly in autumn (Middelbo et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, which was heavily influenced by fresh water, the direct grazing by copepods were only about 6% of the daily primary production during July and August (Figs. E, 7), and grazing by microzooplankton were likely more important (Arendt et al ). At the stations less influenced by fresh water the grazing impact by copepods was substantially higher (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%