2017
DOI: 10.1002/trtr.1568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giving Feedback: Preparing Students for Peer Review and Self‐Evaluation

Abstract: Revision is an important aspect of the writing process but is often challenging for students. Peer review can be helpful, but training is needed for it to work effectively. This article suggests an approach to preparing students for peer review by teaching specific evaluation criteria and leading collaborative practice in reviewing papers written by unknown peers. This practice supports self‐evaluation as well as peer review and increases students’ knowledge of effective writing and the quality of their own wr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The revision results suggest that critical reading was challenging for students. This confirms the role of comprehension in critical reading for revision (Hayes, ) and also the value of using genre‐specific evaluation criteria (Philippakos, ; Philippakos & MacArthur, , ). The use of evaluation criteria supported students in giving feedback, but perhaps instruction on reviewing could also address comprehension.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The revision results suggest that critical reading was challenging for students. This confirms the role of comprehension in critical reading for revision (Hayes, ) and also the value of using genre‐specific evaluation criteria (Philippakos, ; Philippakos & MacArthur, , ). The use of evaluation criteria supported students in giving feedback, but perhaps instruction on reviewing could also address comprehension.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The writer or peer reviewer would first score each element (0 if the element was absent, 1 if it was underdeveloped, or 2 if it was well developed) and then write suggestions (Philippakos, MacArthur, & Coker, 2015). The inclusion of genre-specific criteria versus general evaluation criteria can better guide the writer's critical evaluation for revisions (Hoogeveen & van Gelderen, 2015;Philippakos, 2017;Philippakos & MacArthur, 2016a).…”
Section: Feature Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soo (2015) pointed out that a set of clear rules in completing a task and maintaining group harmony can make the learners work together even though they might have peers who have lower proficiency compared to the rest. Phillipakos (2017) highlighted that effective learning can be achieved through three steps. The first is in making it clear to students about the graded criteria for the writing assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows an example of a second-grade student's task analysis prior to responding to a persuasive topic: Should students be asked to do chores at home? Task analysis was part of the planning, and students were taught how to plan, draft, and evaluate to revise and edit their work (Philippakos, 2017a(Philippakos, , 2018. The student's response demonstrates how her analysis reflects the demands of the assignment and how she effectively identified her goals to focus her effort.…”
Section: The Ingredients Of Effective Task Analysis In Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%