2006
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00577.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GIP-(3–42) does not antagonize insulinotropic effects of GIP at physiological concentrations

Abstract: dent insulinotropic polypeptide ] is degraded by dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV), forming . In mice, high concentrations of synthetic GIP-(3-42) may function as a GIP receptor antagonist, but it is unclear whether this occurs at physiological concentrations. In COS-7 cells transiently transfected with the human GIP receptor, GIP-(1-42) and -(3-42) bind with affinities (IC50) of 5.2 and 22 nM, respectively. GIP-(1-42) was a potent agonist, stimulating cAMP accumulation (EC50, 13.5 pM); GIP-(3-42) alone had no … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects were not associated with the inhibition of insulin secretion, which suggests that endogenously produced GIP is not involved in the modulation of b-cell function through antagonism of the normal stimulatory effects of GIP. It should also be noted that recent results have shown GIP not to antagonise the insulinotrophic effects of GIP at physiological concentrations (Deacon et al 2006), although dosing concentrations employed in the present study far exceeded the physiological concentration of GIP. Possible improvement of insulin Figure 4 Effects of daily GIP and GLP-1(9-36)amide administration on insulin sensitivity in ob/ob mice.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…These effects were not associated with the inhibition of insulin secretion, which suggests that endogenously produced GIP is not involved in the modulation of b-cell function through antagonism of the normal stimulatory effects of GIP. It should also be noted that recent results have shown GIP not to antagonise the insulinotrophic effects of GIP at physiological concentrations (Deacon et al 2006), although dosing concentrations employed in the present study far exceeded the physiological concentration of GIP. Possible improvement of insulin Figure 4 Effects of daily GIP and GLP-1(9-36)amide administration on insulin sensitivity in ob/ob mice.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Hence, it seems reasonable to consider whether differences in the ratios of intact to cleaved incretin peptides have biological implications. Although GIP(3-42) may be a weak GIP receptor antagonist in vitro, it does not exert glucoregulatory actions in vivo (71,72).…”
Section: Biological Importance Of Glp-1(9-36)amide and Gip(3-42)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, GIP is rapidly metabolised by the ubiquitous enzyme dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPP IV) to release the N-terminal dipeptide Tyr 1 -Ala 2 , giving rise to a biologically inactive fragment (Deacon et al 2006). However, N-terminally modified analogues of GIP have profound resistance to DPP IV-mediated degradation, such as [D-Ala 2 ]GIP (Hinke et al 2002, Widenmaier et al 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%