2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.75.184522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ginzburg-Landau equations with consistent Langevin terms for nonuniform wires

Abstract: Many analyses based on the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau model are not consistent with statistical mechanics, because thermal fluctuations are not taken correctly into account. We use the fluctuation-dissipation theorem in order to establish the appropriate size of the Langevin terms, and thus ensure the required consistency. Fluctuations of the electromagnetic potential are essential, even when we evaluate quantities that do not depend directly on it. Our method can be cast in gauge-invariant form. We perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameter NA in the ballistic limit is a function of the domain wall resistance [2] R DW with NA ¼ e 2 nAR DW Á=P@ ¼ e 2 n DW Á 2 =P@ with n the electron density, A the lateral cross section of the wire, DW ¼ R DW A=Á the DW resistivity. For n ¼ 5:6 Â 10 28 m À3 in Co [25], a DW resistivity DW ¼ 3:9 Â 10 À10 m can be derived from the T sample ¼ 250 K value ( DW ¼ 0:9 Â 10 À10 m for T sample ¼ 300 K) that agrees with the DW resistivity measured by Aziz et al [26] in similar Ptð3:5 nmÞ=Coð0:6 nmÞ=Ptð1:6 nmÞ structures at room temperature ( DW ¼ 2:3 Â 10 À10 m). The momentum transfer is thus a possible mechanism to explain our experimental results.…”
Section: -2 Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter NA in the ballistic limit is a function of the domain wall resistance [2] R DW with NA ¼ e 2 nAR DW Á=P@ ¼ e 2 n DW Á 2 =P@ with n the electron density, A the lateral cross section of the wire, DW ¼ R DW A=Á the DW resistivity. For n ¼ 5:6 Â 10 28 m À3 in Co [25], a DW resistivity DW ¼ 3:9 Â 10 À10 m can be derived from the T sample ¼ 250 K value ( DW ¼ 0:9 Â 10 À10 m for T sample ¼ 300 K) that agrees with the DW resistivity measured by Aziz et al [26] in similar Ptð3:5 nmÞ=Coð0:6 nmÞ=Ptð1:6 nmÞ structures at room temperature ( DW ¼ 2:3 Â 10 À10 m). The momentum transfer is thus a possible mechanism to explain our experimental results.…”
Section: -2 Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of fluctuations in open wires, or of rings that do not enclose magnetic flux, was studied elsewhere [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only modification that is required in order to apply the procedure of Ref. 16 is in the boundary condition forψ, which in the case that flux Φ is enclosed becomesψ(L) = exp(2πiΦ/Φ 0 )ψ(0).…”
Section: A One-dimensional Loopsmentioning
confidence: 99%