2018
DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant posterior pararenal schwannoma: A�case report and review of literature

Abstract: Schwannomas, arising from Schwann cells of peripheral nerve sheaths, are primarily benign tumors. They are rarely found in the retroperitoneal space. To date, ~30 cases on giant retroperitoneal schwannomas have been reported. Those with a location of pararenal space are even rarer. Clinically, they are often misdiagnosed as malignancies. In the present study, a case of a 35-year-old woman with a giant schwannoma measuring 13 × 8.5 × 6.5 cm in the posterior pararenal space of left retroperitoneum was presented,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schwannoma was reported firstly by Verocay in 1908 [2] and identified originated from Schwann cells on Stallworthy reported the first case of retroperitoneal schwannoma until 1944 [4]. So far, a few cases of renal schwannoma have been reported, especially giant tumor cases with a diameter of more than 10 cm (Table 1) [5][6][7][8][9]. Most renal schwannomas were reported to occur in the ages between 30 and 60 years, and the incidence had no significant difference in males and females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schwannoma was reported firstly by Verocay in 1908 [2] and identified originated from Schwann cells on Stallworthy reported the first case of retroperitoneal schwannoma until 1944 [4]. So far, a few cases of renal schwannoma have been reported, especially giant tumor cases with a diameter of more than 10 cm (Table 1) [5][6][7][8][9]. Most renal schwannomas were reported to occur in the ages between 30 and 60 years, and the incidence had no significant difference in males and females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%