2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2014.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant persistent currents in quasiperiodic mesoscopic rings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large part of the literature reported so far describes the phenomenon of persistent currents considering perfect periodic rings as well as completely random ones [13][14][15][16][17] . But a little less attention was paid to the quasi-periodic ring structures [18][19][20][21] which actually bridge the gap between these fully ordered and randomly disordered phases. However, the studies involving persistent current in quasi-periodic ring geometries are mostly confined within non-interacting picture and, to the best of our knowledge, no one has addressed its behavior in presence of spin-orbit (SO) interaction which can bring significant new features into light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large part of the literature reported so far describes the phenomenon of persistent currents considering perfect periodic rings as well as completely random ones [13][14][15][16][17] . But a little less attention was paid to the quasi-periodic ring structures [18][19][20][21] which actually bridge the gap between these fully ordered and randomly disordered phases. However, the studies involving persistent current in quasi-periodic ring geometries are mostly confined within non-interacting picture and, to the best of our knowledge, no one has addressed its behavior in presence of spin-orbit (SO) interaction which can bring significant new features into light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each ring the total number of lattice sites (represented by red balls) is de ned by the parameter N. The rings are connected with each other through the lattice sites α, β and/or (α ′ , β ′ ). and multi-channel loop conductors , while too limited amount of works has been done in connected network [26,27], and most importantly the role of connectivity among the loops has not been well explored even today, to the best of our knowledge, which might be quite interesting. This is one of our key motivations behind this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction. -The phenomenon of circular current due to voltage bias in a nanojunction possessing single and/or multiple loops is relatively very less exposed [1][2][3][4][5] compared to the well-established non-decaying circular current in an isolated loop in the presence of magnetic flux [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. For the latter case, the magnetic flux is responsible to break the symmetry among clockwise and counterclockwise propagating electronic waves which yields a net circular charge current that even persists when the flux is removed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the latter case, the magnetic flux is responsible to break the symmetry among clockwise and counterclockwise propagating electronic waves which yields a net circular charge current that even persists when the flux is removed. This phenomenon is referred to as flux-driven circular current in an isolated loop conductor (not coupled to external baths) and has been extensively studied in the literature over the past several years [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%