Analogous to circular spin current in an isolated quantum loop, bias induced spin circular current can also be generated under certain physical conditions in a nanojunction having single and/or multiple loop geometries which we propose first time, to the best of our concern, considering a magnetic quantum system. The key aspect of our work is the development of a suitable theory for defining and analyzing circular spin current in presence of environmental dephasing and impurities. Unlike transport current in a conducting junction, circular current may enhance significantly in presence of disorder and phase randomizing processes. Our analysis provides a new spin dependent phenomenon, and can give important signatures in designing suitable spintronic devices as well as selective spin regulations.• Case I -In absence of spin flip transmission: a. When spin flip transmission is absent, the relations between different spin dependent current densities with transmission components are as follows. J i→i+1,↑↑ = T ↑↑ ; J i→i+1,↓↓ = T ↓↓ , and J i→i+1,↑↓ = J i→i+1,↓↑ = T ↑↓ = T ↓↑ = 0 ∀ i. Thus, as an example, we can write these relations for Fig. 2 as: J 1→2,↑↑ = J 2→3,↑↑ = T ↑↑ and J 1→2,↓↓ = J 2→3,↓↓ = T ↓↓ . And, the spin flipped terms are:Here, all the spin dependent current densities in different bonds are conserved.• Case II -In presence of spin flip transmission:a. In presence of spin flip transmission, different components behave as follows. J i→i+1,↑↑ = T ↑↑ ; J i→i+1,↓↓ = T ↓↓ ; J i→i+1,↑↓ = T ↑↓ ; J i→i+1,↓↑ = T ↓↑ ∀ i. Thus, for the two bonds shown in Fig. 2 we get J 1→2,↑↑ = J 2→3,↑↑ = T ↑↑ ; J 1→2,↓↓ = J 2→3,↓↓ = T ↓↓ ; J 1→2,↑↓ = J 2→3,↑↓ = T ↑↓ ; and J 1→2,↓↑ = J 2→3,↓↑ = T ↓↑ . Here individual components are no longer conserved for different bonds.b. Another interesting observation is that for a particular bond J i→i+1,↑↓ becomes identical with * Electronic address: santanu.maiti@isical.ac.in